Characteristics and determinants of personal exposure to PM2.5 mass and components in adult subjects in the megacity of Guangzhou, China. (1st March 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Chen, Xiao-Cui; Jahn, Heiko J.; Ward, Tony J.; Ho, Hung Chak; Luo, Ming; Engling, Guenter; Kraemer, Alexander
• Is Part Of: Atmospheric environment. Volume 224(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-03-01
• Subjects: Personal exposure -- PM2.5 constituents -- Within-subject variability -- Mixed-effects model; Air -- Pollution -- Periodicals; Air -- Pollution -- Meteorological aspects -- Periodicals; 551.51
• DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117295
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1352-2310

Abstract

Abstract: Understanding the heterogeneity between ambient concentration and personal exposure is crucial in studies regarding the health risks of air pollution exposure. We performed a panel study with 4–19 (average = 10) repeated personal monitoring in 16 adult subjects (ages 18–30) for three consecutive weeks during the winter and summer of 2011–2012 in the Chinese megacity of Guangzhou. Also, we conducted simultaneous ambient measurements at eight districts (including five urban sites, two suburban locations, and one rural site) of Guangzhou. Significant seasonal variations were shown in personal PM2.5 exposure for most of the analyzed components ( p < 0.05), with higher levels in winter than in summer. Average personal exposures exhibited a pattern of central urban > suburban > rural areas for PM2.5 mass and most of the constituents (e.g., carbonaceous aerosols, ions). We applied mixed-effects models to estimate within- and between-subject variance components and determinants of personal PM2.5 exposure after adjusting for potential confounders. The within-subject variance component dominated the total variability (63.7–95.6%) for most of the investigated PM2.5 components. Ambient PM2.5 mass and its components were the dominant predictors and contributors of the corresponding personal exposures (0.11 < R c 2 < 0.97; p < 0.05). The results indicate that season and district type affect personal PM2.5 exposure and its components, contributing to 4.9–51.6% and 8.0–77.8% of the variability. Time indoors and outdoors were also factors affecting personal exposure. The study findings revealed ambient concentrations at a fixed monitoring station underestimated residents' true exposure levels. In conclusion, the current study emphasizes the need for incorporating spatio-temporal activity patterns complementing evenly-distributed air quality monitoring networks to increase the estimation power in epidemiological analysis linking true personal exposure to health effects. Highlights: Repeated personal monitoring is required in epidemiological study design for assessing the health effects of PM2.5 exposure. Within-subject variance dominated the total variability of most exposure data. Average ambient concentrations from multiple monitoring sites serve as better surrogates for young adults exposures. Ambient concentrations, season, district type, and time indoors were factors influencing personal exposures.