Citizen scientists reveal nationwide trends and drivers in the breeding activity of a threatened bird, the malleefowl (Leipoa ocellata). (June 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Benshemesh, Joe; Southwell, Darren; Barker, Richard; McCarthy, Michael
• Is Part Of: Biological conservation. Volume 246(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-06
• Subjects: Poisson regression -- Megapodes -- Incubator mounds -- Mallee -- Volunteers -- Interval censoring; Conservation of natural resources -- Periodicals; Nature conservation -- Periodicals; Ecology -- Periodicals; Environment -- Periodicals; Environmental Pollution -- Periodicals; Electronic journals; 333.9516
• DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108573
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0006-3207

Abstract

Abstract: Citizen scientists regularly collect monitoring data for threatened species to improve the spatial and temporal resolution of sampling. Such programs should adopt robust data assurance measures and statistical approaches to reduce observer bias and better inform uncertainty estimates while supporting management decisions. In this study, we estimated trends and drivers of malleefowl ( Leipoa ocellata ) breeding activity within a Bayesian hierarchical modelling framework using 1823 site × years of nest count data collected by volunteers in Australia. Our modelling suggests malleefowl breeding activity decreased 4.8% annually in South Australia (−0.050; 95%CIs −0.062, −0.037), decreased 2.1% annually in Western Australia (−0.022; 95%CI −0.040, −0.004), was stable in Victoria (−0.001; 95%CI −0.010, 0.009) and increased 4.8% annually in New South Wales (0.047; 95%CI 0.009, 0.086). We found strong evidence for positive associations between winter rainfall (0.084; 95%CI 0.004, 0.165), time since fire (0.288; 95%CI 0.179, 0.399) and an interaction between time since fire and the proportion of a site burnt (0.292; 95%CI 0.173, 0.410). Malleefowl breeding activity was negatively associated with patch size (−0.255; 95% CI −0.642, 0.020) and the proportion of a site burnt (−0.191; 95% CI −0.363, −0.030), suggesting small reserves are important for conservation and the extent and frequency of fire should be managed cautiously. While our index of fox abundance decreased as baiting effort increased (−0.484; 95%CI −0.640, −0.317), there was little evidence for this benefiting malleefowl. This study demonstrates how volunteers can play a vital role understanding population trends and informing conservation of a threatened species at a national scale. Highlights: Malleefowl breeding activity has declined alarmingly in southern Australia. Rainfall and time since fire are strong influences of malleefowl breeding activity. Predator control reduced fox activity, but had little benefit to malleefowl. Citizen scientists vastly increased the spatial and temporal resolution of sampling.