Older adults' preferred and perceived roles in decision-making about palliative chemotherapy, decision priorities and information preferences. Issue 4 (May 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Older adults' preferred and perceived roles in decision-making about palliative chemotherapy, decision priorities and information preferences. Issue 4 (May 2020)
- Main Title:
- Older adults' preferred and perceived roles in decision-making about palliative chemotherapy, decision priorities and information preferences
- Authors:
- Moth, Erin B.
Kiely, Belinda E.
Martin, Andrew
Naganathan, Vasi
Della-Fiorentina, Stephen
Honeyball, Florian
Zielinski, Rob
Steer, Christopher
Mandaliya, Hiren
Ragunathan, Abiramy
Blinman, Prunella - Abstract:
- Abstract: Aim: Patients with cancer have varied preferences for involvement in decision-making. We sought older adults' preferred and perceived roles in decision-making about palliative chemotherapy; priorities; and information received and desired. Methods: Patients ≥65y who had made a decision about palliative chemotherapy with an oncologist completed a written questionnaire. Preferred and perceived decision-making roles were assessed by the Control Preferences Scale. Wilcoxon rank-sum tests evaluated associations with preferred role. Factors important in decision-making were rated and ranked, and receipt of, and desire for information was described. Results: Characteristics of the 179 respondents: median age 74y, male (64%), having chemotherapy (83%), vulnerable (Vulnerable Elders Survey-13 score ≥ 3) (52%). Preferred decision-making roles ( n = 173) were active in 39%, collaborative in 27%, and passive in 35%. Perceived decision-making roles ( n = 172) were active in 42%, collaborative in 22%, and passive in 36% and matched the preferred role for 63% of patients. Associated with preference for an active role: being single/widowed ( p = .004, OR = 1.49), having declined chemotherapy ( p = .02, OR = 2.00). Ranked most important ( n = 159) were "doing everything possible" (30%), "my doctor's recommendation" (26%), "my quality of life" (20%), and "living longer" (15%). A minority expected chemotherapy to cure their cancer (14%). Most had discussed expectations of cureAbstract: Aim: Patients with cancer have varied preferences for involvement in decision-making. We sought older adults' preferred and perceived roles in decision-making about palliative chemotherapy; priorities; and information received and desired. Methods: Patients ≥65y who had made a decision about palliative chemotherapy with an oncologist completed a written questionnaire. Preferred and perceived decision-making roles were assessed by the Control Preferences Scale. Wilcoxon rank-sum tests evaluated associations with preferred role. Factors important in decision-making were rated and ranked, and receipt of, and desire for information was described. Results: Characteristics of the 179 respondents: median age 74y, male (64%), having chemotherapy (83%), vulnerable (Vulnerable Elders Survey-13 score ≥ 3) (52%). Preferred decision-making roles ( n = 173) were active in 39%, collaborative in 27%, and passive in 35%. Perceived decision-making roles ( n = 172) were active in 42%, collaborative in 22%, and passive in 36% and matched the preferred role for 63% of patients. Associated with preference for an active role: being single/widowed ( p = .004, OR = 1.49), having declined chemotherapy ( p = .02, OR = 2.00). Ranked most important ( n = 159) were "doing everything possible" (30%), "my doctor's recommendation" (26%), "my quality of life" (20%), and "living longer" (15%). A minority expected chemotherapy to cure their cancer (14%). Most had discussed expectations of cure (70%), side effects (88%) and benefits (82%) of chemotherapy. Fewer had received quantitative prognostic information (49%) than desired this information (67%). Conclusion: Older adults exhibited a range of preferences for involvement in decision-making about palliative chemotherapy. Oncologists should seek patients' decision-making preferences, priorities, and information needs when discussing palliative chemotherapy. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of geriatric oncology. Volume 11:Issue 4(2020)
- Journal:
- Journal of geriatric oncology
- Issue:
- Volume 11:Issue 4(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 11, Issue 4 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 11
- Issue:
- 4
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0011-0004-0000
- Page Start:
- 626
- Page End:
- 632
- Publication Date:
- 2020-05
- Subjects:
- Geriatric oncology -- Periodicals
Neoplasms -- Periodicals
Aged -- Periodicals
Geriatric oncology
Electronic journals
Periodicals
618.976994005 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/18794068 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/18794068 ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/18794068 ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.jgo.2019.07.026 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1879-4068
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 13361.xml