Severe coral loss shifts energetic dynamics on a coral reef. (5th May 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Morais, Renato A.; Depczynski, Martial; Fulton, Christopher; Marnane, Michael; Narvaez, Pauline; Huertas, Victor; Brandl, Simon J.; Bellwood, David R.
• Editors: El‐Sabaawi, Rana
• Is Part Of: Functional ecology. Volume 34:Number 7(2020)
• Page Start: 1507
• Page End: 1518
• Publication Date: 2020-05-05
• Subjects: coral reef fishes -- ecosystem function -- fish productivity -- reef degradation -- standing biomass -- turnover; Ecology -- Periodicals; 574.505
• DOI: 10.1111/1365-2435.13568
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0269-8463

Abstract

Abstract: Declining coral cover and loss of structural complexity are widely reported on today's coral reefs. While coral loss frequently triggers changes in coral reef fish assemblage structure, the ecosystem‐scale consequences of these changes are poorly known. Here we evaluate how four metrics of energy flow and storage that underscore a critical coral reef function, consumer biomass production, respond to severe coral loss on a coral reef in the northern Great Barrier Reef, Australia. We compared fish and benthic surveys at Lizard Island from 2003 to 2004 with surveys in 2018 using an individual‐level modelling approach that integrates growth and mortality coefficients to estimate community‐level standing biomass, productivity, consumed biomass and turnover. In the study period, coral cover declined by 72%–83% in forereef zones while turf cover increased by 18%–100% across all zones. Reef fish assemblages, in turn, responded with a 71% increase in standing biomass, 41% in productivity and 37% in consumed biomass, mainly driven by nominally‐herbivorous fishes (Labridae—Scarini, Acanthuridae and Siganidae). By contrast, biomass turnover rates declined by 19%. Our findings suggest that coral loss can drive energetic shifts on coral reefs, leading to more productive, but slower paced reef fish assemblages. Although the observed build‐up of biomass may appear positive, the decreased turnover rates indicate that the system is unable to maintain biomass replacement levels. This suggests that the enhanced productivity that accompanied coral loss may be driven by storage effects from the somatic growth of individuals already present, questioning the temporal stability of these changes to coral reef ecosystem functioning. A free Plain Language Summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article. Abstract : A free Plain Language Summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article.