Implications of zero‐deforestation commitments: Forest quality and hunting pressure limit mammal persistence in fragmented tropical landscapes. Issue 3 (19th January 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Deere, Nicolas J.; Guillera‐Arroita, Gurutzeta; Platts, Philip J.; Mitchell, Simon L.; Baking, Esther L.; Bernard, Henry; Haysom, Jessica K.; Reynolds, Glen; Seaman, Dave J. I.; Davies, Zoe G.; Struebig, Matthew J.
• Is Part Of: Conservation letters. Volume 13:Issue 3(2020)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2020-01-19
• Subjects: biodiversity -- camera‐trapping -- habitat fragmentation -- High Carbon Stock Approach -- land‐use planning -- occupancy modeling -- oil palm -- RSPO -- Southeast Asia -- tropical forest; Biodiversity conservation -- Periodicals; Biodiversity -- Monitoring -- Periodicals; 333.9516
• DOI: 10.1111/conl.12701
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1755-263X

Abstract

Abstract: Zero‐deforestation commitments seek to decouple agricultural production and forest loss to improve prospects for biodiversity. However, the effectiveness of methods designed to meet these commitments is poorly understood. In a highly fragmented tropical landscape dominated by oil palm, we tested the capacity for the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach to prioritize forest remnants that sustain mammal diversity. Patches afforded high priority by HCS protocols (100 ha core area) provided important refuges for IUCN‐threatened species and megafauna. However, patch‐scale HCS area recommendations conserved only 35% of the mammal community. At least 3, 000 ha would be required to retain intact mammal assemblages, with nearly 10 times this area needed if hunting pressure was high. While current HCS protocols will safeguard patches capable of sustaining biodiversity, highly fragmented tropical landscapes typical of zero‐deforestation pledges will require thinking beyond the patch toward strategically configured forest remnants at the landscape level and enforcing strict controls on hunting.