How to diagnose heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: the HFA–PEFF diagnostic algorithm: a consensus recommendation from the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). (5th March 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- How to diagnose heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: the HFA–PEFF diagnostic algorithm: a consensus recommendation from the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). (5th March 2020)
- Main Title:
- How to diagnose heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: the HFA–PEFF diagnostic algorithm: a consensus recommendation from the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)
- Authors:
- Pieske, Burkert
Tschöpe, Carsten
de Boer, Rudolf A.
Fraser, Alan G.
Anker, Stefan D.
Donal, Erwan
Edelmann, Frank
Fu, Michael
Guazzi, Marco
Lam, Carolyn S.P.
Lancellotti, Patrizio
Melenovsky, Vojtech
Morris, Daniel A.
Nagel, Eike
Pieske-Kraigher, Elisabeth
Ponikowski, Piotr
Solomon, Scott D.
Vasan, Ramachandran S.
Rutten, Frans H.
Voors, Adriaan A.
Ruschitzka, Frank
Paulus, Walter J.
Seferovic, Petar
Filippatos, Gerasimos - Abstract:
- Abstract : Making a firm diagnosis of chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains a challenge. We recommend a new stepwise diagnostic process, the 'HFA–PEFF diagnostic algorithm'. Step 1 ( P =Pre‐test assessment) is typically performed in the ambulatory setting and includes assessment for heart failure symptoms and signs, typical clinical demographics (obesity, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, elderly, atrial fibrillation), and diagnostic laboratory tests, electrocardiogram, and echocardiography. In the absence of overt non‐cardiac causes of breathlessness, HFpEF can be suspected if there is a normal left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction, no significant heart valve disease or cardiac ischaemia, and at least one typical risk factor. Elevated natriuretic peptides support, but normal levels do not exclude a diagnosis of HFpEF. The second step ( E : Echocardiography and Natriuretic Peptide Score) requires comprehensive echocardiography and is typically performed by a cardiologist. Measures include mitral annular early diastolic velocity ( e ′), LV filling pressure estimated using E / e ′, left atrial volume index, LV mass index, LV relative wall thickness, tricuspid regurgitation velocity, LV global longitudinal systolic strain, and serum natriuretic peptide levels. Major (2 points) and Minor (1 point) criteria were defined from these measures. A score ≥5 points implies definite HFpEF; ≤1 point makes HFpEF unlikely. An intermediate score (2–4 points)Abstract : Making a firm diagnosis of chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains a challenge. We recommend a new stepwise diagnostic process, the 'HFA–PEFF diagnostic algorithm'. Step 1 ( P =Pre‐test assessment) is typically performed in the ambulatory setting and includes assessment for heart failure symptoms and signs, typical clinical demographics (obesity, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, elderly, atrial fibrillation), and diagnostic laboratory tests, electrocardiogram, and echocardiography. In the absence of overt non‐cardiac causes of breathlessness, HFpEF can be suspected if there is a normal left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction, no significant heart valve disease or cardiac ischaemia, and at least one typical risk factor. Elevated natriuretic peptides support, but normal levels do not exclude a diagnosis of HFpEF. The second step ( E : Echocardiography and Natriuretic Peptide Score) requires comprehensive echocardiography and is typically performed by a cardiologist. Measures include mitral annular early diastolic velocity ( e ′), LV filling pressure estimated using E / e ′, left atrial volume index, LV mass index, LV relative wall thickness, tricuspid regurgitation velocity, LV global longitudinal systolic strain, and serum natriuretic peptide levels. Major (2 points) and Minor (1 point) criteria were defined from these measures. A score ≥5 points implies definite HFpEF; ≤1 point makes HFpEF unlikely. An intermediate score (2–4 points) implies diagnostic uncertainty, in which case Step 3 (F1 : Functional testing) is recommended with echocardiographic or invasive haemodynamic exercise stress tests. Step 4 (F2 : Final aetiology) is recommended to establish a possible specific cause of HFpEF or alternative explanations. Further research is needed for a better classification of HFpEF. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- European journal of heart failure. Volume 22:Number 3(2020)
- Journal:
- European journal of heart failure
- Issue:
- Volume 22:Number 3(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 22, Issue 3 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 22
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0022-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- 391
- Page End:
- 412
- Publication Date:
- 2020-03-05
- Subjects:
- Heart failure -- HFpEF -- Diagnosis -- Echocardiography -- Biomarkers -- Natriuretic peptides -- Exercise echocardiography
Heart failure -- Periodicals
Heart Failure -- Periodicals
Insuffisance cardiaque -- Périodiques
Heart failure
Periodicals
616.129005 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1879-0844 ↗
http://rave.ohiolink.edu/ejournals/issn/13889842/ ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/13889842 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/ejhf.1741 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1388-9842
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3829.729860
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 13331.xml