Laparoscopic total biopsy for suspected gallbladder cancer: A case series. Issue 2 (20th April 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Tokumitsu, Yukio; Shindo, Yoshitaro; Matsui, Hiroto; Matsukuma, Satoshi; Nakajima, Masao; Yoshida, Shin; Iida, Michihisa; Suzuki, Nobuaki; Takeda, Shigeru; Nagano, Hiroaki
• Is Part Of: Health science reports. Volume 3:Issue 2(2020)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2020-04-20
• Subjects: gallbladder bed dissection -- gallbladder cancer -- laparoscopic surgery -- Total biopsy -- whole‐layer cholecystectomy; 610
• DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.156
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2398-8835

Abstract

Abstract: Background and aims: Imaging diagnosis of gallbladder cancer remains difficult to achieve preoperatively. We developed a novel approach based on laparoscopic whole‐layer cholecystectomy (LWLC) and laparoscopic gallbladder bed dissection (LGBD) for total biopsy, for ultimately determining the optimal treatment strategy for suspected gallbladder cancer detected on preoperative imaging. Here, we describe a case series of patients who underwent this procedure at our institution. Methods: We retrospectively examined clinicopathological data of consecutive patients with suspected gallbladder carcinoma at Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine from September 2016 to July 2018 on which a laparoscopic approach was used. Preoperative imaging findings suggestive of gallbladder cancer were defined as follows: elevated lesion >10 mm in diameter, increasing tumor size over time compared with the previous imaging, sessile lesion, irregular wall thickness lesion mimicking cancer, elevated lesion with dense enhancement, or positive results on fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. LWLC was performed for early‐stage or suspected malignant lesions without liver invasion, and LGBD was performed for lesions with an unclear border between the gallbladder and the liver. When postoperative pathological examination revealed the presence of gallbladder cancer invading into the subserosal layer, additional gallbladder bed resection and regional lymphadenectomy were considered. Patient characteristics, perioperative findings, pathological findings, and postoperative outcomes of patients who underwent LWLC or LGBD were reviewed retrospectively, and the short‐term outcomes of the laparoscopic approach were analyzed. Results: Fifteen consecutive patients were included in the study. The median age of the patients was 63 years (IQR 42‐76 years); 7 patients were males. We performed LWLC in 12 cases and LBGD in 3 cases. Median (IQR) operation time was 159 (140‐193) min and median blood loss was 10 (5–30) mL. No bile leakage caused by intraoperative perforation of the gallbladder was seen. Median hospital stay was 7 (5–9) days. Only one patient developed postoperative complications (abdominal abscess). Histologically, gallbladder cancer was diagnosed in five cases (pT1a, n = 2; pT2, n = 3), and two of the pT2 patients underwent additional open surgery. Conclusions: Our laparoscopic‐based approach for suspected gallbladder cancer might represent a safe strategy and could play an important role in defining the optimal treatment strategy.