Intraoral Camera Use in a Dental School Clinic: Evaluations by Faculty, Students, and Patients. Issue 11 (1st November 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Murrell, Michael; Marchini, Leonardo; Blanchette, Derek; Ashida, Sato
• Is Part Of: Journal of dental education. Volume 83:Issue 11(2019)
• Page Start: 1339
• Page End: 1344
• Publication Date: 2019-11-01
• Subjects: predoctoral dental education -- restorative dentistry -- dental school clinic -- clinical education -- intraoral camera -- dentist‐ patient relations -- patient satisfaction; Dentistry -- Study and teaching -- Periodicals; Dentistry -- Study and teaching; Education, Dental; Dentisterie -- Étude et enseignement -- Périodiques; Tandheelkunde; Onderwijs; Periodicals; Periodical; Electronic journals; 617.6007
• DOI: 10.21815/JDE.019.140
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0022-0337

Abstract

Abstract : The aims of this study were to assess the perceptions of dental students, faculty members, and patients about the benefits and pitfalls of intraoral camera use and to compare the completion rate of treatment planned posterior crowns with and without intraoral camera use in a predoctoral dental clinic. From July 2016 to June 2017, all 60 fourth‐year dental students at one U.S. dental school were encouraged to use the intraoral camera in treatment planning with patients in the school clinic. Perceptions of the students, their patients, and the faculty members supervising the treatment planning were assessed with a survey at the end of the treatment planning appointment. The completion rate of treatment planned posterior crowns was determined by recalling all posterior teeth that were treatment planned for a single unit crown at a specific period of time compared to the number of the same crowns completed for the same patients at a specific period of time, using the electronic health record, with and without camera use. Of the 60 students, 51 completed 198 surveys (85% response rate); 35 faculty members completed 64 surveys, and 202 patients completed one survey each (response rates for those groups could not be calculated). The survey results suggested that the students, faculty, and patients viewed intraoral camera use in a positive way. However, faculty perceptions were a little lower than those of patients and students, and a significant number of faculty members were neutral. The completion rate of posterior planned crowns was significantly higher (p=0.0005) when intraoral cameras were used to present images to patients than when cameras were not used. In this study, intraoral camera use in a predoctoral clinic was perceived positively by students and patients but more neutrally by faculty, and it increased the completion rate of planned posterior crowns.