Detection of anti‐NS1 antibodies after pandemic influenza exposure: Evaluation of a serological method for distinguishing H1N1pdm09 infected from vaccinated cases. Issue 3 (19th January 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Detection of anti‐NS1 antibodies after pandemic influenza exposure: Evaluation of a serological method for distinguishing H1N1pdm09 infected from vaccinated cases. Issue 3 (19th January 2020)
- Main Title:
- Detection of anti‐NS1 antibodies after pandemic influenza exposure: Evaluation of a serological method for distinguishing H1N1pdm09 infected from vaccinated cases
- Authors:
- Robertson, Anna Hayman
Mahic, Milada
Savic, Miloje
Tunheim, Gro
Hungnes, Olav
Trogstad, Lill
Lipkin, Walter Ian
Mjaaland, Siri - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: Reliable exposure information is crucial for assessing health outcomes of influenza infection and vaccination. Current serological methods are unable to distinguish between anti‐hemagglutinin (HA) antibodies induced by infection or vaccination. Objectives: We aimed to explore an alternative method for differentiating influenza infection and vaccination. Methods: Sera from animals inoculated with influenza viruses or purified H1N1pdm09 HA were obtained. Human samples were selected from a pregnancy cohort established during the 2009 H1N1 pandemic. Unvaccinated, laboratory‐confirmed cases (N = 18), vaccinated cases without influenza‐like‐illness (N = 18) and uninfected, unvaccinated controls (N = 18) were identified based on exposure data from questionnaires, national registries and maternal hemagglutination inhibition (HI) titres at delivery. Animal and human samples were tested for antibodies against the non‐structural protein 1 (NS1) and HA from H1N1pdm09, using a Luciferase Immunoprecipitation System (LIPS). Results: Anti‐NS1 H1N1pdm09 antibodies were detected in sera from experimentally infected, but not from vaccinated, animals. Anti‐HA H1N1pdm09 antibodies were detectable after either of these exposures. In human samples, 28% of individuals with laboratory‐confirmed influenza were seropositive for H1N1pdm09 NS1, whereas vaccinated cases and controls were seronegative. There was a trend for H1N1pdm09 NS1 seropositive cases reporting more severe andAbstract: Background: Reliable exposure information is crucial for assessing health outcomes of influenza infection and vaccination. Current serological methods are unable to distinguish between anti‐hemagglutinin (HA) antibodies induced by infection or vaccination. Objectives: We aimed to explore an alternative method for differentiating influenza infection and vaccination. Methods: Sera from animals inoculated with influenza viruses or purified H1N1pdm09 HA were obtained. Human samples were selected from a pregnancy cohort established during the 2009 H1N1 pandemic. Unvaccinated, laboratory‐confirmed cases (N = 18), vaccinated cases without influenza‐like‐illness (N = 18) and uninfected, unvaccinated controls (N = 18) were identified based on exposure data from questionnaires, national registries and maternal hemagglutination inhibition (HI) titres at delivery. Animal and human samples were tested for antibodies against the non‐structural protein 1 (NS1) and HA from H1N1pdm09, using a Luciferase Immunoprecipitation System (LIPS). Results: Anti‐NS1 H1N1pdm09 antibodies were detected in sera from experimentally infected, but not from vaccinated, animals. Anti‐HA H1N1pdm09 antibodies were detectable after either of these exposures. In human samples, 28% of individuals with laboratory‐confirmed influenza were seropositive for H1N1pdm09 NS1, whereas vaccinated cases and controls were seronegative. There was a trend for H1N1pdm09 NS1 seropositive cases reporting more severe and longer duration of symptomatic illness than seronegative cases. Anti‐HA H1N1pdm09 antibodies were detected in all cases and in 61% of controls. Conclusions: The LIPS method could differentiate between sera from experimentally infected and vaccinated animals. However, in human samples obtained more than 6 months after the pandemic, LIPS was specific, but not sufficiently sensitive for ascertaining cases by exposure. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Influenza and other respiratory viruses. Volume 14:Issue 3(2020)
- Journal:
- Influenza and other respiratory viruses
- Issue:
- Volume 14:Issue 3(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 14, Issue 3 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 14
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0014-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- 294
- Page End:
- 301
- Publication Date:
- 2020-01-19
- Subjects:
- H1N1pdm09 -- influenza -- NS1 -- pandemic -- serology -- vaccination
Influenza -- Periodicals
Respiratory infections -- Periodicals
Virus diseases -- Periodicals
Influenza, Human -- Periodicals
Respiratory Tract Diseases -- Periodicals
Virus Diseases -- Periodicals
Grippe -- Périodiques
Appareil respiratoire -- Infections -- Périodiques
Maladies à virus -- Périodiques
616.203 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1750-2659 ↗
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/openurl?genre=journal&stitle=irv ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗
http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1750-2640&site=1 ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/irv.12712 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1750-2640
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4478.854000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 13318.xml