A 3D deep convolutional neural network approach for the automated measurement of cerebellum tracer uptake in FDG PET‐CT scans. Issue 3 (6th January 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Xiong, Xiaofan; Linhardt, Timothy J.; Liu, Weiren; Smith, Brian J.; Sun, Wenqing; Bauer, Christian; Sunderland, John J.; Graham, Michael M.; Buatti, John M.; Beichel, Reinhard R.
• Is Part Of: Medical physics. Volume 47:Issue 3(2020)
• Page Start: 1058
• Page End: 1066
• Publication Date: 2020-01-06
• Subjects: cerebellum segmentation -- deep convolutional neural networks -- positron emission tomography; Medical physics -- Periodicals; Medical physics; Geneeskunde; Natuurkunde; Toepassingen; Biophysics; Periodicals; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 610.153
• DOI: 10.1002/mp.13970
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0094-2405

Abstract

Abstract : Purpose: The purpose of this work was to assess the potential of deep convolutional neural networks in automated measurement of cerebellum tracer uptake in F‐18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) scans. Methods: Three different three‐dimensional (3D) convolutional neural network architectures (U‐Net, V‐Net, and modified U‐Net) were implemented and compared regarding their performance in 3D cerebellum segmentation in FDG PET scans. For network training and testing, 134 PET scans with corresponding manual volumetric segmentations were utilized. For segmentation performance assessment, a fivefold cross‐validation was used, and the Dice coefficient as well as signed and unsigned distance errors were calculated. In addition, standardized uptake value (SUV) uptake measurement performance was assessed by means of a statistical comparison to an independent reference standard. Furthermore, a comparison to a previously reported active‐shape‐model‐based approach was performed. Results: Out of the three convolutional neural networks investigated, the modified U‐Net showed significantly better segmentation performance. It achieved a Dice coefficient of 0.911 ± 0.026, a signed distance error of 0.220 ± 0.103 mm, and an unsigned distance error of 1.048 ± 0.340 mm. When compared to the independent reference standard, SUV uptake measurements produced with the modified U‐Net showed no significant error in slope and intercept. The estimated reduction in total SUV measurement error was 95.1%. Conclusions: The presented work demonstrates the potential of deep convolutional neural networks in automated SUV measurement of reference regions. While it focuses on the cerebellum, utilized methods can be generalized to other reference regions like the liver or aortic arch. Future work will focus on combining lesion and reference region analysis into one approach.