Effects of genetic origin on phenotypic divergence in Brook Trout populations stocked with domestic fish. Issue 5 (14th May 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Gossieaux, Philippine; Lavoie, Émilie; Sirois, Pascal; Thibault, Isabel; Bernatchez, Louis; Garant, Dany
• Is Part Of: Ecosphere. Volume 11:Issue 5(2020)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2020-05-14
• Subjects: geometric morphometrics -- otoliths -- salmonids -- stable isotopes -- stocking; Ecology -- Periodicals; Ecology; Periodicals; 577.05
• DOI: 10.1002/ecs2.3119
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2150-8925

Abstract

Abstract: Phenotypic changes due to human activities are occurring at a far greater speed than those originating from natural causes in animal populations. For instance, phenotypic divergence among individuals may arise in populations supplemented with farm‐reared fish that are known to display different phenotypes from those of wild individuals because of domestication. Little is known about how these phenotypic differences are maintained when domestic and wild individuals face the same environment and hybridize, as it is the case after supplementation. In this study, we assessed the effect of genetic origin of individuals on phenotypic trait divergence (morphology, growth, and size‐at‐age) in stocked populations of Brook Trout ( Salvelinus fontinalis ). We also evaluated whether genetic origin influences habitat use by documenting trophic niche and/or level using stable isotope analyses. We found significant effects of genetic origin on phenotypic variables with domestic fish generally being more fusiform and larger than wild and hybrid individuals. Lake identity also explained most of the variation in phenotypic variables, meaning that population‐specific attributes were important drivers of morphology and size. Our results also showed that domestic fish were feeding in more littoral niches and at a higher trophic level than wild and hybrid individuals, suggesting that differences in feeding habits could partially explain phenotypic differences. These results highlight the importance of accounting for the genetic composition of populations when assessing the causes of phenotypic divergence in the wild.