Paired 10Be sampling of polished bedrock and erratic boulders to improve dating of glacial landforms: an example from the Western Alps. Issue 5 (27th February 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Prud'homme, Charlotte; Vassallo, Riccardo; Crouzet, Christian; Carcaillet, Julien; Mugnier, Jean‐Louis; Cortés‐Aranda, Joaquin
• Is Part Of: Earth surface processes and landforms. Volume 45:Issue 5(2020)
• Page Start: 1168
• Page End: 1180
• Publication Date: 2020-02-27
• Subjects: glacial landforms -- polished bedrocks -- erratic boulders -- 10Be dating; Geomorphology -- Periodicals; 551.4
• DOI: 10.1002/esp.4790
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0197-9337

Abstract

Abstract: Cosmogenic nuclide dating of glacial landforms may lead to ambiguous results for ice retreat histories. The persistence of significant cosmogenic concentrations inherited from previous exposure may increase the apparent exposure ages for polished bedrocks affected by limited erosion under ice and for erratic boulders transported by glaciers and previously exposed in high‐altitude rock walls. In contrast, transient burying by moraines, sediments and snow decreases the apparent exposure age. We propose a new sampling strategy, applied to four sites distributed in the Arc and Arve valleys in the Western Alps, to better constrain the factors that can bias exposure ages associated with glacial processes. We used the terrestrial cosmogenic nuclide 10 Be (TCN) to estimate the exposure time from paired sampling of depth profiles in polished bedrock and on overlying erratic boulders. For a given sampling site, the exposure ages for both the polished bedrock and boulder are expected to be the same. However, in six cases out of seven, boulders had significantly higher 10 Be surface concentrations than those of the associated polished surfaces. In present and past glacial processes, the 10 Be distribution with depth for boulders and bedrocks implies the presence of an inheritance concentration of 10 Be. Our study suggests that 10 Be concentrations in erratic boulders and in polished bedrocks provide maximum and minimum exposure ages of the glacial retreat, respectively. © 2019 The Authors. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd Abstract : Cosmogenic nuclide dating is commonly used to date the exposition age of glacial landforms but this method may lead to ambiguous results for ice retreat histories. The persistence of significant cosmogenic concentrations inherited from previous exposure may increase the apparent exposure ages for polished bedrocks affected by limited erosion under ice and for erratic boulders transported by glaciers and previously exposed in high altitude rock walls. In contrast, transient burying by moraines, sediments and snow decreases the apparent exposure age. We propose a new sampling strategy, applied to four sites in the western Alps to better constrain the factors that can bias exposure ages associated with glacial processes. We used the terrestrial cosmogenic nuclide 10Be to estimate the exposure time from paired sampling of depth profiles until 3 m in polished bedrock and on overlying erratic boulders.