Size matters: Dissecting key parameters for panel‐based tumor mutational burden analysis. Issue 4 (4th December 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Buchhalter, Ivo; Rempel, Eugen; Endris, Volker; Allgäuer, Michael; Neumann, Olaf; Volckmar, Anna‐Lena; Kirchner, Martina; Leichsenring, Jonas; Lier, Amelie; von Winterfeld, Moritz; Penzel, Roland; Christopoulos, Petros; Thomas, Michael; Fröhling, Stefan; Schirmacher, Peter; Budczies, Jan; Stenzinger, Albrecht
• Is Part Of: International journal of cancer. Volume 144:Issue 4(2019)
• Page Start: 848
• Page End: 858
• Publication Date: 2018-12-04
• Subjects: tumor mutational burden -- TMB -- mutational load -- panel -- NGS -- sequencing; Cancer -- Periodicals; Cancer -- Prevention -- Periodicals; 616.994
• DOI: 10.1002/ijc.31878
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0020-7136

Abstract

Abstract : Tumor mutational burden (TMB) represents a new determinant of clinical benefit from immune checkpoint blockade that identifies responders independent of PD‐L1 expression levels and is currently being explored in clinical trials. Although TMB can be measured directly by comprehensive genomic approaches such as whole‐genome and exome sequencing, broad availability, short turnaround times, costs and amenability to formalin‐fixed and paraffin‐embedded tissue support the use of gene panel sequencing for approximating TMB in routine diagnostics. However, data on the parameters influencing panel‐based TMB estimation are limited. Here, we report an extensive in silico analysis of the TCGA data set that simulates various panel sizes and compositions. We demonstrate that panel size is a critical parameter that influences confidence intervals (CIs) and cutoff values as well as important test parameters including sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value. Moreover, we evaluate the Illumina TSO500 panel, which will be made available for TMB estimation, and propose dynamic, entity‐specific cutoff values based on current clinical trial data. Optimizing the cost–benefit ratio, our data suggest that panels between 1.5 and 3 Mbp are ideally suited to estimate TMB with small CIs, whereas smaller panels tend to deliver imprecise TMB estimates for low to moderate TMB (0–30 muts/Mbp), connected with insufficient separation of hypermutated tumors from non‐hypermutated tumors. Abstract : What's new? While the immune system can fight cancer, tumor clones may hijack the body's own mechanisms of dampening immune responses by expressing immune‐checkpoint proteins. Tumor mutational burden (TMB) is an emerging selection biomarker for patients who would benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Unification of TMB estimation and driver mutation detection in a single panel sequencing assay is highly desirable but challenging, however. Combinatorial calculations and simulations in the TCGA dataset show that panel sizes greater than 1.5 Mbp are recommendable, and–although not immunogenic–synonymous and nonsense mutations can be included in TMB estimation together with cancer‐type specific correction factors.