Sample collection for laboratory‐based study of the nasal airway and sinuses: a research compendium. Issue 3 (17th December 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Massey, Conner J.; Diaz Del Valle, Fernando; Abuzeid, Waleed M.; Levy, Joshua M.; Mueller, Sarina; Levine, Corrina G.; Smith, Stephanie S.; Bleier, Benjamin S.; Ramakrishnan, Vijay R.
• Is Part Of: International forum of allergy & rhinology. Volume 10:Issue 3(2020:Mar.)
• Page Start: 303
• Page End: 313
• Publication Date: 2019-12-17
• Subjects: nasal cavity -- paranasal sinuses -- clinical protocols -- sinusitis -- nasal lavage fluid -- nasal mucosa -- cytologic techniques -- exosomes; 617.51005
• DOI: 10.1002/alr.22510
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2042-6976

Abstract

Abstract : Background: Collection of biologic samples from the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses is of critical importance to the study of infectious or inflammatory conditions that affect both upper and lower airways. Numerous techniques for the study of ex‐vivo samples exist, with specific applications, strengths, and weaknesses associated with each of them. In this compendium we summarize the available methods for collection of primary human samples and incorporate expert discussion of the pros, cons, and applications associated with each technique. Methods: An expert panel containing members of the American Rhinologic Society's Research and Grants Committee compiled this educational reference. Rationale for use and the potential advantages and disadvantages are discussed. Research protocols and key references are enumerated. Results: Sampling of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses can be achieved through a number of methods. Nonspecific sinonasal secretions may be collected via forced exhalation, nasal lavage, and nasal spray aspiration. Targeted collection of sinonasal secretions may be achieved via endoscopic placement of absorbent matrices. Nasal cytology or collection of superficial epithelium may be completed via brushing or scraping of endonasal structures. Collection of mucosal biopsies may be completed via sinonasal explant or full‐thickness biopsy. Conclusion: Multiple sampling techniques are available to collect biologic samples from the sinonasal cavity. These techniques differ in their ease of application, reproducibility, sample yield, and utility for different sinonasal pathologies or research goals. An appreciation of the benefits and drawbacks of each approach will allow investigators to select the techniques most appropriate for achieving research objectives.