Deep Soil Carbon: Quantification and Modeling in Subsurface Layers. Issue Volume 78:Issue Supplement 1(2014) (2nd May 2014)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Deep Soil Carbon: Quantification and Modeling in Subsurface Layers. Issue Volume 78:Issue Supplement 1(2014) (2nd May 2014)
- Main Title:
- Deep Soil Carbon: Quantification and Modeling in Subsurface Layers
- Authors:
- James, Jason
Devine, Warren
Harrison, Rob
Terry, Thomas - Abstract:
- Abstract : Soil is the primary sink for C in forest ecosystems but is often overlooked in ecosystem C budgets. Efforts to quantify C pools often sample soils to a depth of 0.2 m despite observations that deep soil C is neither scarce nor entirely stable. This study examined the systematic sampling depth for ecosystem C analyses in the Pacific Northwest and compared best‐fit models of C in deep soil layers with laboratory measurements. Forest floor samples and mineral soil bulk density samples were collected at regular intervals from the soil surface to depths of 2.5 m from 22 sites across the coastal Pacific Northwest Douglas‐fir [ Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco] zone. Soil samples were screened to 4.7 mm and analyzed for C content. We found that systematic soil sampling shallower than 1.5 m significantly underestimated total soil C. On average, sampling to 2.5 m compared with 0.5 m increased total C by 156% (85.3–132.7 Mg ha −1 ), and 21% of total C within the depth range sampled was below 1.0 m. A nonlinear mixed model using an inverse polynomial curve form and predicting total C to 2.5 m given only data to 1.0 m was reliable for 20 of 22 sites; the sites that could not be accurately modeled carried the greatest C at depth and contained noncrystalline minerals. Shallow soil sampling at best provides a biased estimate and at worst leads to misleading conclusions regarding soil C. Researchers seeking to quantify soil C or measure change with time should sample deepAbstract : Soil is the primary sink for C in forest ecosystems but is often overlooked in ecosystem C budgets. Efforts to quantify C pools often sample soils to a depth of 0.2 m despite observations that deep soil C is neither scarce nor entirely stable. This study examined the systematic sampling depth for ecosystem C analyses in the Pacific Northwest and compared best‐fit models of C in deep soil layers with laboratory measurements. Forest floor samples and mineral soil bulk density samples were collected at regular intervals from the soil surface to depths of 2.5 m from 22 sites across the coastal Pacific Northwest Douglas‐fir [ Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco] zone. Soil samples were screened to 4.7 mm and analyzed for C content. We found that systematic soil sampling shallower than 1.5 m significantly underestimated total soil C. On average, sampling to 2.5 m compared with 0.5 m increased total C by 156% (85.3–132.7 Mg ha −1 ), and 21% of total C within the depth range sampled was below 1.0 m. A nonlinear mixed model using an inverse polynomial curve form and predicting total C to 2.5 m given only data to 1.0 m was reliable for 20 of 22 sites; the sites that could not be accurately modeled carried the greatest C at depth and contained noncrystalline minerals. Shallow soil sampling at best provides a biased estimate and at worst leads to misleading conclusions regarding soil C. Researchers seeking to quantify soil C or measure change with time should sample deep soil to create a more complete picture of soil pools and fluxes. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Soil Science Society of America Journal. Volume 78:Issue Supplement 1(2014)
- Journal:
- Soil Science Society of America Journal
- Issue:
- Volume 78:Issue Supplement 1(2014)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 78, Issue 1 (2014)
- Year:
- 2014
- Volume:
- 78
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2014-0078-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- S1
- Page End:
- S10
- Publication Date:
- 2014-05-02
- Subjects:
- Soils -- United States -- Periodicals
Soil science -- Periodicals
Periodicals
631.4973 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗
https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/14350661 ↗ - DOI:
- 10.2136/sssaj2013.06.0245nafsc ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0361-5995
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 14418.xml