Comparable survival outcome between transplantation from haploidentical donor and matched related donor or unrelated donor for severe aplastic anemia patients aged 40 years and older: A retrospective multicenter cohort study. Issue 3 (20th February 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Comparable survival outcome between transplantation from haploidentical donor and matched related donor or unrelated donor for severe aplastic anemia patients aged 40 years and older: A retrospective multicenter cohort study. Issue 3 (20th February 2020)
- Main Title:
- Comparable survival outcome between transplantation from haploidentical donor and matched related donor or unrelated donor for severe aplastic anemia patients aged 40 years and older: A retrospective multicenter cohort study
- Authors:
- Zhang, Yuan‐Yuan
Mo, Wen‐Jian
Zuo, Yang‐Yang
Zhou, Ming
Zhang, Xiao‐Hui
Wang, Yu
Li, Yu‐Miao
Zhang, Yu‐Ping
Chen, Yu‐Hong
Chen, Xiao‐Wei
Mo, Xiao‐Dong
Wang, Cai‐Xia
Lin, Fan
Huang, Xiao‐Jun
Wang, Shun‐Qing
Xu, Lan‐Ping - Abstract:
- Abstract: This retrospective multicenter cohort study aimed to compare the outcome of haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HID‐HSCT) with matched sibling donor (MSD) and unrelated donor (URD) transplantation in severe aplastic anemia (SAA) patients 40 years of age and older. With a median follow‐up time of 17.6 months, 85 consecutive patients were enrolled in the study, and the median patient age was 45 years (40, 58). The cumulative engraftment rates of neutrophil and platelet were 98.8 ± 0.0% and 92.9 ± 0.1%. The cumulative incidences of Grade 2‐4 acute graft‐versus‐host disease (aGvHD) and chronic graft‐versus‐host disease (cGvHD) at 3 years were 14.1 ± 0.1% and 17.3 ± 0.2%. The 3‐year estimated overall survival (OS) and failure‐free survival (FFS) were 91.2 ± 3.2% and 89.7 ± 3.5%. In multivariate analysis, the only factor associated with inferior survival was an ECOG score ≥2. HID‐HSCT was associated with a higher incidence of GvHD, but the difference of 3‐year estimated OS between HID group and the other two cohorts was not significant (86.7 ± 6.4% for HID vs 92.1% ± 4.4% for MSD and 100% for URD, P = .481). HID‐HSCT might be a feasible alternative option for selected SAA patients aged 40 years and older without a matched donor.
- Is Part Of:
- Clinical transplantation. Volume 34:Issue 3(2020)
- Journal:
- Clinical transplantation
- Issue:
- Volume 34:Issue 3(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 34, Issue 3 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 34
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0034-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- n/a
- Page End:
- n/a
- Publication Date:
- 2020-02-20
- Subjects:
- elderly -- haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation -- severe aplastic anemia
Transplantation of organs, tissues, etc -- Periodicals
617.95 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/member/institutions/issuelist.asp?journal=ctr ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/ctr.13810 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0902-0063
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3286.399780
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 13215.xml