Can Meaning at Work Guard Against the Consequences of Objectification?. Issue 3 (June 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Auzoult, Laurent
• Is Part Of: Psychological reports. Volume 123:Issue 3(2020)
• Page Start: 872
• Page End: 884
• Publication Date: 2020-06
• Subjects: Meaning at work -- objectification -- self-objectification -- health in the workplace; Psychology -- Periodicals; Psychiatry; Psychology; Psychologie -- Périodiques; Psychology; 150.5
• DOI: 10.1177/0033294119826891
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0033-2941

Abstract

Objectification at work reflects instrumentality and denial of humanness in work relationships. These relationships have deleterious consequences for workplace health. One of the consequences of this type of relationship is self-objectification in which the self is perceived as a non-person or as an object. This phenomenon leads to perceiving oneself without mental states (i.e., dementalization) or as an instrument (i.e., instrumentalization) and as a nonperson (i.e., loss of humanness). However, few studies have considered how to reduce these consequences. In this study, we examine the protective role of meaning at work against the consequences of objectification. A total of 153 employees answered an online questionnaire which measured objectification, meaning of work, mentalization, and instrumentality/humanness. The results highlight an impact of objectification on instrumentality and humanness but not on mentalization as in previous studies. There is also a moderation effect of the meaning of work on the relationship between objectification and humanness. These results lead us to consider instrumentality, humanness, and dementalization as separate constructs accounting for self-objectification.