Comparison of gene disruption induced by cytosine base editing‐mediated iSTOP with CRISPR/Cas9‐mediated frameshift. (29th April 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Comparison of gene disruption induced by cytosine base editing‐mediated iSTOP with CRISPR/Cas9‐mediated frameshift. (29th April 2020)
- Main Title:
- Comparison of gene disruption induced by cytosine base editing‐mediated iSTOP with CRISPR/Cas9‐mediated frameshift
- Authors:
- Dang, Lu
Li, Guanglei
Wang, Xinjie
Huang, Shisheng
Zhang, Yu
Miao, Yuanxin
Zeng, Lisi
Cui, Shuzhong
Huang, Xingxu - Abstract:
- Abstract: Objectives: Recently developed CRISPR‐dependent cytosine base editor (CBE), converting four codons (CAA, CAG, CGA and TGG) into stop codons without DNA double‐strand breaks (DSB), serves as an efficient gene disruption strategy besides uncontrollable CRISPR‐mediated frameshift. However, the detailed difference of gene knockout between the two systems has not been clarified. Materials and methods: Here, we selected some sgRNAs with different position background, then HEK293T cells were transfected with CBE/Cas9 plasmids together with sgRNAs. GFP‐positive cells were harvested by fluorescence‐activated cell sorting (FACS) 48 hours after transfection. Genomic DNA was collected for deep sequencing to analyse editing efficiency and genotype. RNA and protein were extracted to analyse gene mRNA level using qPCR analysis and Western blot. Results: Here, we compared the gene disruption by CBE‐mediated iSTOP with CRISPR/Cas9‐mediated frameshift. We found BE‐mediated gene knockout yielded fewer genotypes. BE‐mediated gene editing precisely achieved silencing of two neighbouring genes, while CRISPR/Cas9 may delete the large fragment between two target sites. All of three stop codons could efficiently disrupt the target genes. It is worth notifying, Cas9‐mediated gene knockout showed a more impact on neighbouring genes mRNA level than the BE editor. Conclusions: Our results reveal the differences between the two gene knockout strategies and provide useful information forAbstract: Objectives: Recently developed CRISPR‐dependent cytosine base editor (CBE), converting four codons (CAA, CAG, CGA and TGG) into stop codons without DNA double‐strand breaks (DSB), serves as an efficient gene disruption strategy besides uncontrollable CRISPR‐mediated frameshift. However, the detailed difference of gene knockout between the two systems has not been clarified. Materials and methods: Here, we selected some sgRNAs with different position background, then HEK293T cells were transfected with CBE/Cas9 plasmids together with sgRNAs. GFP‐positive cells were harvested by fluorescence‐activated cell sorting (FACS) 48 hours after transfection. Genomic DNA was collected for deep sequencing to analyse editing efficiency and genotype. RNA and protein were extracted to analyse gene mRNA level using qPCR analysis and Western blot. Results: Here, we compared the gene disruption by CBE‐mediated iSTOP with CRISPR/Cas9‐mediated frameshift. We found BE‐mediated gene knockout yielded fewer genotypes. BE‐mediated gene editing precisely achieved silencing of two neighbouring genes, while CRISPR/Cas9 may delete the large fragment between two target sites. All of three stop codons could efficiently disrupt the target genes. It is worth notifying, Cas9‐mediated gene knockout showed a more impact on neighbouring genes mRNA level than the BE editor. Conclusions: Our results reveal the differences between the two gene knockout strategies and provide useful information for choosing the appropriate gene disruption strategy. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Cell proliferation. Volume 53:Number 5(2020)
- Journal:
- Cell proliferation
- Issue:
- Volume 53:Number 5(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 53, Issue 5 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 53
- Issue:
- 5
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0053-0005-0000
- Page Start:
- n/a
- Page End:
- n/a
- Publication Date:
- 2020-04-29
- Subjects:
- Cell proliferation -- Periodicals
571.84 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2184 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/cpr.12820 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0960-7722
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3097.854000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 13187.xml