GitHub's milestone tool: A mixed‐methods analysis on its use. Issue 4 (20th November 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Zhang, Yang; Wang, Huaimin; Wu, Yiwen; Hu, Dongyang; Wang, Tao
• Is Part Of: Journal of software. Volume 32:Issue 4(2020)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2019-11-20
• Subjects: GitHub -- issues -- milestone tool -- open source; Software engineering -- Periodicals; Computer software -- Development -- Periodicals; Software maintenance -- Periodicals; 005.1
• DOI: 10.1002/smr.2229
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2047-7473

Abstract

Abstract: Social coding site GitHub provides developers with many management tools to facilitate project maintenance and developer collaboration. Milestone tool, in particular, plays an important role in organizing and tracking progress on groups of issues or pull requests in a project. However, few research has analyzed the milestone tool, even though it has been used in practice for a long time. In this paper, we want to address this literature gap and present an ongoing work aimed at investigating the use of the milestone tool in GitHub open‐source projects. We conduct a mixed‐methods analysis in a large‐scale dataset of GitHub projects, to help developers gain some insights into the milestone tool, including its usage, benefits, and limitations. We quantitatively investigate the basic adoption of milestone tool and its correlation with project properties. We also survey developers to understand the reasons for using milestone tool or not and their perceptions of the milestone tool. We find that certain types of projects use milestone tool more than others. Adopting the milestone tool is associated with more commits, more releases, and more project popularity, but the current milestone tool also has some limitations. These observations can then be forwarded to the GitHub community for follow‐up and can result in them potentially making a better milestone tool.