Two‐piece zirconia versus titanium implants after 80 months: Clinical outcomes from a prospective randomized pilot trial. Issue 4 (27th January 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Koller, Martin; Steyer, Elisabeth; Theisen, Kerstin; Stagnell, Sami; Jakse, Norbert; Payer, Michael
• Is Part Of: Clinical oral implants research. Volume 31:Issue 4(2020)
• Page Start: 388
• Page End: 396
• Publication Date: 2020-01-27
• Subjects: all‐ceramic crowns -- titanium implants -- yttria‐stabilized zirconia implants; Dental implants -- Research -- Periodicals; 617.69
• DOI: 10.1111/clr.13576
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0905-7161

Abstract

Abstract: Objectives: To prospectively evaluate, as part of an ongoing randomized pilot trial, the clinical outcomes of two‐piece zirconia implants in comparison with titanium implants 80 months after delivery of all‐ceramic (lithium disilicate) single‐tooth restorations. Material and methods: The original sample included 31 (16 zirconia and 15 titanium) implants in 22 healthy patients. In addition to evaluating implant survival and success, a number of clinical or radiographic parameters were statistically analyzed: plaque index (PI), bleeding on probing (BOP), pink esthetic score (PES), and marginal bone loss (MBL). Both implant groups were compared using a Mann–Whitney U test. Results: Three implants (2 zirconia and 1 titanium) had been lost, so that 28 implants (14 zirconia and 14 titanium) in 21 patients could be evaluated after a mean of 80.9 ( SD : 5.5) months. All surviving implants had remained stable, in the absence of any fixture or abutment fractures and without any chipping, fracture, or debonding of crowns. The zirconia implants were associated with PI values of 11.07% ( SD : 8.11) and the titanium implants with 15.20% ( SD : 15.58), the respective figures for the other parameters being 16.43% ( SD : 6.16) or 12.60% ( SD : 7.66) for BOP; 11.11 ( SD : 1.27) or 11.56 ( SD : 1.01) for PES; and 1.38 mm ( SD : 0.81) or 1.17 mm ( SD : 0.73) for MBL. Conclusions: No significant differences were found between the clinical outcomes of two‐piece zirconia and titanium implants based on the aforementioned parameters after 80 months of clinical service. Our results should be interpreted with the limited sample size in mind.