Combining Frailty and Trabecular Bone Score Did Not Improve Predictive Accuracy in Risk of Major Osteoporotic Fractures. (14th February 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Li, Guowei; Leslie, William D; Kovacs, Christopher S; Prior, Jerilynn; Josse, Robert G; Towheed, Tanveer; Davison, K Shawn; Thabane, Lehana; Papaioannou, Alexandra; Levine, Mitchell AH; Goltzman, David; Zeng, Jie; Qi, Yong; Tian, Junzhan; Adachi, Jonathan D
• Is Part Of: Journal of bone and mineral research. Volume 35:Number 6(2020)
• Page Start: 1058
• Page End: 1064
• Publication Date: 2020-02-14
• Subjects: FRAILTY -- FRAX -- MAJOR OSTEOPOROTIC FRACTURE -- TRABECULAR BONE SCORE; Bones -- Metabolism -- Periodicals; Mineral metabolism -- Periodicals; 612.392
• DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.3971
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0884-0431

Abstract

ABSTRACT: It is recognized that the trabecular bone score (TBS) provides skeletal information, and frailty measurement is significantly associated with increased risks of adverse health outcomes. Given the suboptimal predictive power in fracture risk assessment tools, we aimed to evaluate the combination of frailty and TBS regarding predictive accuracy for risk of major osteoporotic fracture (MOF). Data from the prospective longitudinal study of CaMos (Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study) were used for this study. TBS values were estimated using lumbar spine (L1 to L4 ) dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry (DXA) images; frailty was evaluated by a frailty index (FI) of deficit accumulation. Outcome was time to first incident MOF during the follow‐up. We used the Harrell's C‐index to compare the model predictive accuracy. The Akaike information criterion, likelihood ratio test, and net reclassification improvement (NRI) were used to compare model performances between the model combining frailty and TBS (subsequently called "FI + TBS"), FI‐alone, and TBS‐alone models. We included 2730 participants (mean age 69 years; 70% women) for analyses (mean follow‐up 7.5 years). There were 243 (8.90%) MOFs observed during follow‐up. Participants with MOF had significantly higher FI (0.24 versus 0.20) and lower TBS (1.231 versus 1.285) than those without MOF. FI and TBS were significantly related with MOF risk in the model adjusted for FRAX with bone mineral density (BMD) and other covariates: hazard ratio (HR) = 1.26 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11–1.43) for per‐SD increase in FI; HR = 1.38 (95% CI 1.21–1.59) for per‐SD decrease in TBS; and these associations showed negligible attenuation (HR = 1.24 for per‐SD increase in FI, and 1.35 for per‐SD decrease in TBS) when combined in the same model. Although the model FI + TBS was a better fit to the data than FI‐alone and TBS‐alone, only minimal and nonsignificant enhancement of discrimination and NRI were observed in FI + TBS. To conclude, frailty and TBS are significantly and independently related to MOF risk. Larger studies are warranted to determine whether combining frailty and TBS can yield improved predictive accuracy for MOF risk. © 2020 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.