Spatial variability of sediment methane production and methanogen communities within a eutrophic reservoir: Importance of organic matter source and quantity. (12th December 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Berberich, Megan E.; Beaulieu, Jake J.; Hamilton, Trinity L.; Waldo, Sarah; Buffam, Ishi
• Is Part Of: Limnology and oceanography. Volume 65:Number 6(2020)
• Page Start: 1336
• Page End: 1358
• Publication Date: 2019-12-12
• Subjects: Limnology -- Periodicals; Oceanography -- Periodicals; Océanographie; Limnologie; Limnology; Oceanography; Computer network resources; Périodique électronique (Descripteur de forme); Ressource Internet (Descripteur de forme); Periodicals; 551.4805
• DOI: 10.1002/lno.11392
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0024-3590

Abstract

Abstract: Freshwater reservoirs are an important source of the greenhouse gas methane (CH4 ) to the atmosphere, but global emission estimates are poorly constrained (13.3–52.5 Tg C yr −1 ), partially due to extreme spatial variability in emission rates within and among reservoirs. Spatial heterogeneity in the availability of organic matter (OM) for biological CH4 production by methanogenic archaea may be an important contributor to this variation. To investigate this, we measured sediment CH4 potential production rates, OM source and quantity, and methanogen community composition at 15 sites within a eutrophic reservoir in Ohio, USA. CH4 production rates were highest in the shallow riverine inlet zone of the reservoir, even when rates were normalized to OM quantity, indicating that OM was more readily utilized by methanogens in the riverine zone than in the transitional or lacustrine zones. Sediment stable isotopes and C:N indicated a greater proportion of terrestrial OM in the particulate sediment of this zone. Methanogens were present at all sites, but the riverine zone contained a higher relative abundance of methanogens capable of acetoclastic and methylotrophic methanogenesis, likely reflecting differences in decomposition processes or OM quality. While we found that methane potential production rates were negatively correlated with autochthonous carbon in particulate sediment OM, rates were positively correlated with indicators of autochthonous carbon in the porewater dissolved OM. It is likely that both dissolved and particulate sediment OM affect CH4 production rates, and that both terrestrial and aquatic OM sources are important in the riverine methane production hot spot.