A multi‐contrast MRI approach to thalamus segmentation. Issue 8 (20th January 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Corona, Veronica; Lellmann, Jan; Nestor, Peter; Schönlieb, Carola‐Bibiane; Acosta‐Cabronero, Julio
• Is Part Of: Human brain mapping. Volume 41:Issue 8(2020)
• Page Start: 2104
• Page End: 2120
• Publication Date: 2020-01-20
• Subjects: magnetic resonance imaging -- multi‐contrast segmentation -- thalamic nuclei -- thalamus segmentation; Brain mapping -- Periodicals; 611.81
• DOI: 10.1002/hbm.24933
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1065-9471

Abstract

Abstract: Thalamic alterations occur in many neurological disorders including Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease and multiple sclerosis. Routine interventions to improve symptom severity in movement disorders, for example, often consist of surgery or deep brain stimulation to diencephalic nuclei. Therefore, accurate delineation of grey matter thalamic subregions is of the upmost clinical importance. MRI is highly appropriate for structural segmentation as it provides different views of the anatomy from a single scanning session. Though with several contrasts potentially available, it is also of increasing importance to develop new image segmentation techniques that can operate multi‐spectrally. We hereby propose a new segmentation method for use with multi‐modality data, which we evaluated for automated segmentation of major thalamic subnuclear groups using T 1 ‐weighted, T 2 * ‐weighted and quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) information. The proposed method consists of four steps: Highly iterative image co‐registration, manual segmentation on the average training‐data template, supervised learning for pattern recognition, and a final convex optimisation step imposing further spatial constraints to refine the solution. This led to solutions in greater agreement with manual segmentation than the standard Morel atlas based approach. Furthermore, we show that the multi‐contrast approach boosts segmentation performances. We then investigated whether prior knowledge using the training‐template contours could further improve convex segmentation accuracy and robustness, which led to highly precise multi‐contrast segmentations in single subjects. This approach can be extended to most 3D imaging data types and any region of interest discernible in single scans or multi‐subject templates.