Slow‐pathway visualization by using voltage‐time relationship: A novel technique for identification and fluoroless ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. (15th April 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hale, Zachary D.; Greet, Brian D.; Burkland, David A.; Greenberg, Scott; Razavi, Mehdi; Rasekh, Abdi; Molina Razavi, Joanna E.; Saeed, Mohammad
• Is Part Of: Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology. Volume 31:Number 6(2020)
• Page Start: 1430
• Page End: 1435
• Publication Date: 2020-04-15
• Subjects: arrhythmias -- atrioventricular nodal reentrant -- AVNRT -- cardiac -- fluoroless ablation -- supraventricular -- tachycardia; Blood vessels -- Physiology -- Periodicals; Electrophysiology -- Periodicals; Heart -- Physiology -- Periodicals; 612.1
• DOI: 10.1111/jce.14481
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1045-3873

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is treatable by catheter ablation. Advances in mapping‐system technology permit fluoroless workflow during ablations. As national practice trends toward fluoroless approaches, easily obtained, reproducible methods of slow‐pathway identification, and ablation become increasingly important. We present a novel method of slow‐pathway identification and initial ablation results from this method. Methods and Results: We examined AVNRT ablations performed at our institution over a 12‐month period. In these cases, the site of the slow pathway was predicted by latest activation in the inferior triangle of Koch during sinus rhythm. Ablation was performed in this region. Proximity of the predicted site to the successful ablation location, complication rates, and patient outcomes were recorded. Junctional rhythm was seen in 40/41 ablations (98%) at the predicted site (mean, 1.3 lesions and median, 1 lesion per case). One lesion was defined as 5 mm of ablation. The initial ablation was successful in 39/41 cases (95%); in two cases, greater or equal to 2 echo beats were detected after the initial ablation, necessitating further lesion expansion. In 8/41 cases (20%), greater than one lesion was placed during initial ablation before attempted reinduction. Complications included one transient heart block and one transient PR prolongation. During follow‐up (median, day 51), one patient had lower‐extremity deep‐vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolus, and one had a lower‐extremity superficial venous thrombosis. There was one tachycardia recurrence, which prompted a redo ablation. Conclusions: Mapping‐system detection of late‐activation, low‐amplitude voltage during sinus rhythm provides an objective, and fluoroless means of identifying the slow pathway in typical AVNRT.