A novel fMRI paradigm to dissociate the behavioral and neural components of mixed‐strategy decision making from non‐strategic decisions in humans. (29th October 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Parr, Ashley C.; Coe, Brian C.; Munoz, Douglas P.; Dorris, Michael C.
• Is Part Of: European journal of neuroscience. Volume 51:Number 9(2020)
• Page Start: 1914
• Page End: 1927
• Publication Date: 2019-10-29
• Subjects: functional MRI -- game theory -- Nash equilibrium -- reinforcement; Nervous system -- Periodicals; 612.8
• DOI: 10.1111/ejn.14586
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0953-816X

Abstract

Abstract: During competitive interactions, such as predator–prey or team sports, the outcome of one's actions is dependent on both their own choices and those of their opponents. Success in these rivalries requires that individuals choose dynamically and unpredictably, often adopting a mixed strategy. Understanding the neural basis of strategic decision making is complicated by the fact that it recruits various cognitive processes that are often shared with non‐strategic forms of decision making, such as value estimation, working memory, response inhibition, response selection, and reward processes. Although researchers have explored neural activity within key brain regions during mixed‐strategy games, how brain activity differs in the context of strategic interactions versus non‐strategic choices is not well understood. We developed a novel behavioral paradigm to dissociate choice behavior during mixed‐strategy interactions from non‐strategic choices, and we used task‐based functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to contrast brain activation. In a block design, participants competed in the classic mixed‐strategy game, "matching pennies, " against a dynamic computer opponent designed to exploit predictability in players' response patterns. Results were contrasted with a non‐strategic task that had comparable sensory input, motor output, and reward rate; thus, differences in behavior and brain activation reflect strategic processes. The mixed‐strategy game was associated with activation of a distributed cortico‐striatal network compared to the non‐strategic task. We propose that choosing in mixed‐strategy contexts requires additional cognitive demands present to a lesser degree during the control task, illustrating the strength of this design in probing function of cognitive systems beyond core sensory, motor, and reward processes. Abstract : We developed a novel paradigm to dissociate behavior and associated brain activity during mixed‐strategy interactions from those underlying choices made in non‐strategic environments. Using a carefully designed control task, we show that mixed‐strategy decision‐making is associated with activation of a distributed cortico‐striatal network, and propose that the observed pattern of activation represents the additional cognitive demands of choosing in strategic contexts.