Gastrointestinal ultrasound in inflammatory bowel disease care: Patient perceptions and impact on disease‐related knowledge. Issue 2 (9th October 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Rajagopalan, Arvind; Sathananthan, Dharshan; An, Yoon‐Kyo; Van De Ven, Lucinda; Martin, Serena; Fon, James; Costello, Samuel P; Begun, Jakob; Bryant, Robert V
• Is Part Of: JGH open. Volume 4:Issue 2(2020)
• Page Start: 267
• Page End: 272
• Publication Date: 2019-10-09
• Subjects: gastrointestinal ultrasound -- inflammatory bowel disease -- inflammatory bowel disease imaging -- patient perceptions -- point‐of‐care ultrasound
• DOI: 10.1002/jgh3.12268
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2397-9070

Abstract

Abstract: Background and Aim: Objective monitoring of disease activity is integral to therapeutic decision‐making in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Data are sparse on patients' perspectives of tools used to monitor disease activity in IBD. To evaluate patients' perspectives of gastrointestinal ultrasound (GIUS) performed during routine IBD clinical care, along with its impact on IBD‐specific knowledge. Methods: Patients with a formal diagnosis of IBD who underwent GIUS at two tertiary IBD services between March 2017 and January 2019 participated in this prospective study. Participants completed a questionnaire measuring the acceptability, tolerability, and usefulness of GIUS using a visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0 (disagree) to 10 (strongly agree). Comparative acceptability of IBD monitoring tools and the impact of GIUS on IBD‐specific knowledge was measured. Results: A total of 121 participants completed the questionnaire, with a mean age of 42 years (range 17–78), 54 (45%) males, and 79 (65%) Crohn's disease patients. In the overall population, GIUS was scored as highly acceptable for monitoring IBD (mean 9.20 ± 1.37) compared to colonoscopy (7.94 ± 2.30), stool sampling (8.17 ± 1.96), blood sampling (8.87 ± 1.62), and imaging (8.67 ± 1.60); P < 0.01 for each comparison. GIUS caused little patient discomfort (1.88 ± 1.83), and 98 (81%) participants ranked GIUS as their preferred IBD monitoring tool. GIUS also improved patients' overall IBD‐specific knowledge (VAS IBD‐specific knowledge 7.96 ± 1.92), including their understanding of the need for medical therapy and disease extent. Conclusion: GIUS is a highly acceptable and well‐tolerated tool for monitoring disease activity in IBD patients. GIUS is preferred by patients and enhances IBD‐specific knowledge. Abstract : Gastrointestinal ultrasound (GIUS) is being increasingly used for disease monitoring in inflammatory bowel disease; however, patient perceptions of the different modalities available are sparse. This article evaluates patient perceptions, finding that GIUS was preferred to other modalities, and it was also found to have an impact on disease‐related knowledge.