Is Habitat Constraining Bighorn Sheep Restoration? A Case Study. Issue 3 (3rd February 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Lula, Ethan S.; Lowrey, Blake; Proffitt, Kelly M.; Litt, Andrea R.; Cunningham, Julie A.; Butler, Carson J.; Garrott, Robert A.
• Is Part Of: Journal of wildlife management. Volume 84:Issue 3(2020)
• Page Start: 588
• Page End: 600
• Publication Date: 2020-02-03
• Subjects: habitat -- metapopulation -- Montana -- Ovis canadensis -- resource selection function -- restoration -- RSF -- translocation; Wildlife management -- Periodicals; Zoology -- Periodicals; 333.954
• DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.21823
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0022-541X

Abstract

Abstract : We constructed seasonal habitat models for female bighorn sheep within the Madison Range, southwest Montana, USA, and generated minimum population estimates within the extrapolation area. Our extrapolations of predicted habitat suggest the potential for a broader distribution and a higher abundance of bighorn sheep throughout the Madison Range. Our results provide managers with a useful tool to guide and monitor restoration efforts within the Madison Range, but also serve as a case study evaluating the restoration potential within mountain ranges containing established, but non‐expanding populations of bighorn sheep. ABSTRACT: Rocky Mountain bighorn sheep ( Ovis canadensis ) restoration continues to be a challenge throughout western North America despite nearly a century of efforts dedicated to the species' recovery. Though bighorn sheep restoration may be constrained by several environmental factors and behavioral tendencies, areas with unrealized restoration potential may exist if novel restoration strategies are considered. We used global positioning system (GPS) location data from 27 female bighorn sheep within the southern portion of the Madison Range in southwest Montana, USA, 2015–2017, to develop and validate winter and summer habitat models, which we extrapolated throughout the entire Madison Range to identify potential seasonal habitat. We estimated potential bighorn sheep minimum population estimates within the extrapolation area by linking our top‐ranked winter habitat model to population count data. During summer, female bighorn sheep selected areas characterized by rugged and steep terrain, reduced canopy cover, southwestern aspects, and ridgelines. During winter, female bighorn sheep selected areas characterized by low elevations, southwestern aspects, steep slopes, reduced canopy cover, ridgelines, high normalized difference vegetation index amplitude, and areas close to steep terrain. Predicted summer habitat was concentrated along the high‐elevation ridgelines associated with steep slopes and reduced canopy cover. Predicted winter habitat occurred in a non‐contiguous distribution primarily along the low‐elevation, southwest‐facing aspects along the western slopes of the Madison Range. Our results suggest that the Madison Range may be capable of supporting 780–1, 730 animals, which is 2–4 times the number of bighorn sheep currently observed within the range. Further, our findings provide managers with a quantification of female bighorn sheep habitat and suggests that a strategy focused on establishing a metapopulation through a series of within‐range translocations may enhance bighorn sheep restoration. We suggest that similar restoration opportunities may be common in other unoccupied areas of bighorn sheep historical range. © 2020 The Wildlife Society.