Truth, success, and faith: Novice teachers' perceptions of what's at risk in responsive teaching in science. Issue 4 (5th February 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Robertson, Amy D.; Atkins Elliott, Leslie J.
• Is Part Of: Science education. Volume 104:Issue 4(2020:Jul.)
• Page Start: 736
• Page End: 761
• Publication Date: 2020-02-05
• Subjects: novice teachers -- power -- responsive teaching -- science teaching; Science -- Study and teaching -- Periodicals; 507
• DOI: 10.1002/sce.21568
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0036-8326

Abstract

Abstract: Responsive teaching—or teaching that builds from the "seeds of science" in student thinking—is depicted in STEM education literature as both important and challenging. U.S. science education reform has been calling for teachers to enact instruction that attends to and takes up the substance of students' STEM ideas; however, responsive teaching represents a substantial shift from the current state of affairs in most U.S. classrooms, where content is often presented authoritatively as facts, definitions, and algorithms, with little consideration of student thinking. Drawing on language from literature about sense‐making, this paper identifies some of the "vexation points" that novice science teachers face as they consider implementing responsive teaching practices in science—that is, what doesn't make sense, to teachers, about this instructional approach. In particular, we show that novice teachers express moral concerns about responsive teaching; themes in their written reflections suggest that they perceive responsive teaching to put truth, success, and faith at risk. We argue that though these concerns originally seem distinct from the institutional constraints to responsive teaching posed by the literature, teachers' concerns about truth, success, and faith are in fact mutually reinforced by and reinforcing of external constraints. We use this connection to pose implications for research and teacher education.