Mesh inlay, mesh kit or native tissue repair for women having repeat anterior or posterior prolapse surgery: randomised controlled trial (PROSPECT). (6th April 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Mesh inlay, mesh kit or native tissue repair for women having repeat anterior or posterior prolapse surgery: randomised controlled trial (PROSPECT). (6th April 2020)
- Main Title:
- Mesh inlay, mesh kit or native tissue repair for women having repeat anterior or posterior prolapse surgery: randomised controlled trial (PROSPECT)
- Authors:
- Glazener, CMA
Breeman, S
Elders, A
Hemming, C
Cooper, KG
Freeman, RM
Smith, ARB
Hagen, S
Montgomery, I
Kilonzo, M
Boyers, D
McDonald, A
McPherson, G
MacLennan, G
Norrie, J
Reid, FM - Other Names:
- Hemming/Bain Christine investigator.
Cooper Kevin investigator.
Terry Peter investigator.
Fattah Mohamed Abdel investigator.
Swan Lynn investigator.
Dallas Christine investigator.
Allan Angela investigator.
Henderson Christina investigator.
Agur Wael investigator.
Rae David investigator.
Henry Margo investigator.
Gilmour Danielle investigator.
Farag Khalid investigator.
Dass Meenakshi investigator.
Reid Michelle investigator.
Toozs‐Hobson Philip investigator.
Burton Claire investigator.
Latthe Pallavi investigator.
Parsons Matthew investigator.
Trinham Paula investigator.
Zhao Anna investigator.
Williams Abimbola investigator.
Chia Philip investigator.
Ali‐Ross Nadia investigator.
Rhead Katrina investigator.
Mistry Raksha investigator.
Ramage Carmel investigator.
Calvert Sue investigator.
Bowyer Anne investigator.
Smith Philip investigator.
Cloete Jenny investigator.
Morrison Leigh investigator.
Wilcox Heather investigator.
Ismail Sharif investigator.
Ibraheim Mofid investigator.
Dinardo Lorraine investigator.
Archer Denise investigator.
Kearsley Nichola investigator.
Spriggs Janet investigator.
Devlin Hollie investigator.
Matar Mohamed investigator.
Hagon Claire investigator.
Wilson Toni investigator.
Dasgupta Jay investigator.
Chilaka Victor investigator.
Smith Jill investigator.
Barnett Adrian investigator.
Jackson Tracy investigator.
Worton Rachael investigator.
Bennett Caroline investigator.
Chan Yi Ling investigator.
Bondili A investigator.
Kitchingman Judith investigator.
Gandhi Jagdish investigator.
Bexhell Helen investigator.
Khullar Vik investigator.
Fernando Ruwan investigator.
Digesu Alex investigator.
Underwood Jenny investigator.
Singh Anand investigator.
Tincello Douglas investigator.
Fowler Victoria investigator.
Christie Carla investigator.
Warwick Katie investigator.
Fayyad Abdalla investigator.
Bastion Victoria investigator.
Chin Rose Ann investigator.
Smith Anthony investigator.
Reid Fiona investigator.
Ward Karen investigator.
Rose Karen investigator.
Iles David investigator.
Dwyer Lucy investigator.
Green Linda investigator.
Biancardi Rachel investigator.
Kumakech Wilfred investigator.
Bateman Stephanie investigator.
Connell Rowan investigator.
Lord Susan investigator.
Jones Sharon investigator.
Nolan Tracey investigator.
Casey Rebecca investigator.
Fishwick Kathryn investigator.
Lowry Tracey investigator.
Ward Jackie investigator.
Buckley Sarah investigator.
Townend Claire investigator.
Eckford Seumas investigator.
Eskander Osama investigator.
Belcher Geraldine investigator.
Skinner Amanda investigator.
Stancombe Lucia investigator.
Passmore Deborah investigator.
Parkinson Richard investigator.
Hooper Paul investigator.
Das Mausumi investigator.
Hannigan Rosario investigator.
Jarvis Andy investigator.
Hickman Emma investigator.
Bester Delia investigator.
Heawood Sarah investigator.
Freeman Robert investigator.
Bombieri Luigi investigator.
Brockman Paula investigator.
King Angela investigator.
Cree Beverley investigator.
Hollands Heidi investigator.
Hogston Patrick investigator.
Parkinson Richard investigator.
Wright Denise investigator.
Jenkins Elinor investigator.
Prashar Sanjeev investigator.
MacDonald Pauline investigator.
Butler Julie investigator.
Flintoff Sue investigator.
Patel Daksha investigator.
Field Janet investigator.
Walker Rachel investigator.
Cunningham Mishell investigator.
Pearson Sally Anne investigator.
Harris Meredyth investigator.
Taylor Myles investigator.
Sturley Rachel investigator.
Brown Karen investigator.
Irvine Sarah investigator.
Halpin Julia investigator.
Potter Alison investigator.
Renton Caroline investigator.
Ballard Paul investigator.
Khunda Aethele investigator.
Anderson Colette investigator.
Potts Julie investigator.
Chamberlain Jonathan investigator.
Milford Denise investigator.
Walton Eileen investigator.
Narayanan Subramanian investigator.
Hall Andrew investigator.
Mercer Pauline investigator.
Finson Barbara investigator.
Imoh‐Ita Fabian investigator.
Reyad Manal investigator.
Teklay Mehari investigator.
Adamson Christine investigator.
Hussain Sarah investigator.
Visvanathan Shankar investigator.
Dawlatly Bashir investigator.
Maseko Zandile investigator.
El Naqa Ayman investigator.
Cox Charles investigator.
Afifi Khaled investigator.
Kempson Sharon investigator.
Denyer Nick investigator.
… (more) - Abstract:
- Abstract : Objective: To compare standard (native tissue) repair with synthetic mesh inlays or mesh kits. Design: Randomised controlled trial. Setting: Thirty‐three UK hospitals. Population: Women having surgery for recurrent prolapse. Methods: Women recruited using remote randomisation. Main outcome measures: Prolapse symptoms, condition‐specific quality‐of‐life and serious adverse effects. Results: A Mean Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score at 1 year was similar for each comparison (standard 6.6 versus mesh inlay 6.1, mean difference [MD] −0.41, 95% CI −2.92 to 2.11: standard 6.6 versus mesh kit 5.9, MD −1.21, 95% CI −4.13 to 1.72) but the confidence intervals did not exclude a minimally important clinical difference. There was no evidence of difference in any other outcome measure at 1 or 2 years. Serious adverse events, excluding mesh exposure, were similar at 1 year (standard 7/55 [13%] versus mesh inlay 5/52 [10%], risk ratio [RR] 1.05 [0.66–1.68]: standard 3/25 [12%] versus mesh kit 3/46 [7%], RR 0.49 [0.11–2.16]). Cumulative mesh exposure rates over 2 years were 7/52 (13%) in the mesh inlay arm, of whom four women required surgical revision; and 4/46 in the mesh kit arm (9%), of whom two required surgical revision. Conclusions: We did not find evidence of a difference in terms of prolapse symptoms from the use of mesh inlays or mesh kits in women undergoing repeat prolapse surgery. Although the sample size was too small to be conclusive, the results provide aAbstract : Objective: To compare standard (native tissue) repair with synthetic mesh inlays or mesh kits. Design: Randomised controlled trial. Setting: Thirty‐three UK hospitals. Population: Women having surgery for recurrent prolapse. Methods: Women recruited using remote randomisation. Main outcome measures: Prolapse symptoms, condition‐specific quality‐of‐life and serious adverse effects. Results: A Mean Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score at 1 year was similar for each comparison (standard 6.6 versus mesh inlay 6.1, mean difference [MD] −0.41, 95% CI −2.92 to 2.11: standard 6.6 versus mesh kit 5.9, MD −1.21, 95% CI −4.13 to 1.72) but the confidence intervals did not exclude a minimally important clinical difference. There was no evidence of difference in any other outcome measure at 1 or 2 years. Serious adverse events, excluding mesh exposure, were similar at 1 year (standard 7/55 [13%] versus mesh inlay 5/52 [10%], risk ratio [RR] 1.05 [0.66–1.68]: standard 3/25 [12%] versus mesh kit 3/46 [7%], RR 0.49 [0.11–2.16]). Cumulative mesh exposure rates over 2 years were 7/52 (13%) in the mesh inlay arm, of whom four women required surgical revision; and 4/46 in the mesh kit arm (9%), of whom two required surgical revision. Conclusions: We did not find evidence of a difference in terms of prolapse symptoms from the use of mesh inlays or mesh kits in women undergoing repeat prolapse surgery. Although the sample size was too small to be conclusive, the results provide a substantive contribution to future meta‐analysis. Tweetable abstract: There is not enough evidence to support use of synthetic mesh inlay or mesh kits for repeat prolapse surgery. Tweetable abstract: There is not enough evidence to support use of synthetic mesh inlay or mesh kits for repeat prolapse surgery. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- BJOG. Volume 127:Number 8(2020)
- Journal:
- BJOG
- Issue:
- Volume 127:Number 8(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 127, Issue 8 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 127
- Issue:
- 8
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0127-0008-0000
- Page Start:
- 1002
- Page End:
- 1013
- Publication Date:
- 2020-04-06
- Subjects:
- Pelvic organ prolapse -- randomised controlled trial -- repeat surgery -- synthetic mesh
Obstetrics -- Periodicals
Gynecology -- Periodicals
618 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1470-0328&site=1 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/1471-0528.16197 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1470-0328
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 2105.748000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 13127.xml