Position of Ibero‐American Society of Neurourology and UroGynecology (SINUG) on the use of vaginal meshes in pelvic organ prolapse. Issue 3 (18th February 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Position of Ibero‐American Society of Neurourology and UroGynecology (SINUG) on the use of vaginal meshes in pelvic organ prolapse. Issue 3 (18th February 2020)
- Main Title:
- Position of Ibero‐American Society of Neurourology and UroGynecology (SINUG) on the use of vaginal meshes in pelvic organ prolapse
- Authors:
- Martín‐Martínez, Alicia
Müller‐Arteaga, Carlos
Blasco‐Hernández, Pedro
Padilla‐Fernández, Bárbara
Martínez‐García, Roberto
Errando‐Smet, Carlos
Vicente‐Palacio, Eduardo
Cruz, Francisco
Castro‐Díaz, David
López‐Fando, Luis
Ros‐Cerro, Cristina
Arlandis‐Guzmán, Salvador
Espuña‐Pons, Montserrat - Abstract:
- Abstract: Aims: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a very prevalent condition with a great impact on women's quality of life. At present, there is great controversy regarding the use of mesh in POP surgery. To understand the current moment, it is advisable to make a brief summary of the historical evolution of mesh use for pelvic floor pathology. The aim of this paper is to establish the position of the Ibero‐American Society of Neurourology and UroGynecology (SINUG for its acronym in Spanish) regarding vaginal mesh reconstructive surgery. Methods: A working committee from the SINUG's scientific board performed a literature search about the use of vaginal meshes for pelvic organ prolapse reconstructive surgery and about the position of different societies. We analyzed the evolution into three periods: before the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) statement, FDA statement, and after the statement. SINUG drew up a position statement regarding vaginal mesh reconstructive surgery, based on the available scientific evidence and the evolution of its use in different contexts. Results: Before mesh appearance in the 1990s, native tissue repair was the surgical treatment of choice for POP. Vaginal mesh reconstructive surgery has been frequently accompanied by procedure underestimation by inexperienced surgeons, besides inadequate diagnoses and indications. This situation led to the presentation of serious complications including mesh extrusion, exposure, and contraction. Conclusions:Abstract: Aims: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a very prevalent condition with a great impact on women's quality of life. At present, there is great controversy regarding the use of mesh in POP surgery. To understand the current moment, it is advisable to make a brief summary of the historical evolution of mesh use for pelvic floor pathology. The aim of this paper is to establish the position of the Ibero‐American Society of Neurourology and UroGynecology (SINUG for its acronym in Spanish) regarding vaginal mesh reconstructive surgery. Methods: A working committee from the SINUG's scientific board performed a literature search about the use of vaginal meshes for pelvic organ prolapse reconstructive surgery and about the position of different societies. We analyzed the evolution into three periods: before the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) statement, FDA statement, and after the statement. SINUG drew up a position statement regarding vaginal mesh reconstructive surgery, based on the available scientific evidence and the evolution of its use in different contexts. Results: Before mesh appearance in the 1990s, native tissue repair was the surgical treatment of choice for POP. Vaginal mesh reconstructive surgery has been frequently accompanied by procedure underestimation by inexperienced surgeons, besides inadequate diagnoses and indications. This situation led to the presentation of serious complications including mesh extrusion, exposure, and contraction. Conclusions: Once reviewed the available evidence and the position of different societies, SINUG presents its vision in this communication, which is a summary of the document prepared by the society's scientific board. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Neurourology and urodynamics. Volume 39:Issue 3(2020:Mar.)
- Journal:
- Neurourology and urodynamics
- Issue:
- Volume 39:Issue 3(2020:Mar.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 39, Issue 3 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 39
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0039-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- 1020
- Page End:
- 1025
- Publication Date:
- 2020-02-18
- Subjects:
- consensus statement -- mesh -- pelvic organ prolapse
Urinary organs -- Periodicals
Urodynamics -- Periodicals
Urology -- Periodicals
616.6 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6777 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/nau.24309 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0733-2467
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6081.589000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 13121.xml