A phantom based evaluation of the dose prediction and effects in treatment plans, when calculating on a direct density CT reconstruction. Issue 3 (16th March 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Flatten, Veronika; Friedrich, Alexandra; Engenhart‐Cabillic, Rita; Zink, Klemens
• Is Part Of: Journal of applied clinical medical physics. Volume 21:Issue 3(2020)
• Page Start: 52
• Page End: 61
• Publication Date: 2020-03-16
• Subjects: CT reconstruction algorithm -- DirectDensity -- electron density reconstruction -- image reconstruction; Medical physics -- Periodicals; Clinical medicine -- Periodicals; Health Physics; Clinical Medicine; Electronic journals; Periodicals; Periodicals; Fulltext; Internet Resources; 610.153
• DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12824
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1526-9914

Abstract

Abstract: In radiation therapy, a Computed Tomography (CT) image is needed for an accurate dose calculation. To allow such a calculation, the CT image values have to be converted into relative electron densities. Thus, standard procedure is to calibrate the CT numbers to relative electron density (RED) by using a phantom with known composition inserts. This calibration curve is energy and CT dependent, therefore most radiotherapy CT acquisitions are obtained with 120 kVp, as each tube voltage needs an additional calibration curve. The commercially available DirectDensity TM (DD) reconstruction algorithm presents a reconstruction implementation without any dependence on the tube voltage. In comparison, it allows a calibration curve that is directly proportional to the RED, reducing the need of more than one calibration curve. This could potentially optimize CT acquisitions and reducing the dose given to the patient. Three different phantoms were used to evaluate the DirectDensity TM algorithm in simple and anthropomorphic geometries, as well as setups with metal implants. Scans with the DD algorithm were performed for 80, 100, 120, and 140 kVp. As reference a scan with the standard 120 kVp scan was used. Radiotherapy photon plans were optimized and calculated on the reference image and then transferred to the DD images, where they were recalculated. The dose distributions obtained this way were compared to the reference dose. Differences were found mainly in pure air and high density materials such as bones. The difference of the mean dose was below 0.7%, in most cases below 0.4%. No indication was found that the algorithm is corrupted by metal inserts, enabling the application for all clinical cases. This algorithm offers more variability in CT parameters for radiation therapy and thus a more personalized image acquisition with a high image quality and a lower dose exposure at a robust clinical workflow.