The duty of candour and the NHS agenda. Issue 2 (14th April 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Powell, Martin
• Is Part Of: International journal of health governance. Volume 25:Issue 2(2020)
• Page Start: 107
• Page End: 116
• Publication Date: 2020-04-14
• Subjects: Culture -- Clinical governance -- Health care quality -- Patient safety -- Governance structures -- Qualitative research -- Health law or regulation -- Clinical leadership and culture -- Health service quality assurance; Medical care -- Quality control -- Periodicals; Medical care -- Evaluation -- Periodicals; Outcome assessment (Medical care) -- Periodicals; Medical care -- Finance -- Periodicals; 362.1068
• DOI: 10.1108/IJHG-01-2020-0005
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2059-4631

Abstract

Abstract : Purpose: The purpose of the study is to explore how the duty of candour got onto the agenda of the British National Health Service. Design/methodology/approach: The conceptual approach is based on multiple streams approach, with the methodology being interpretive content analysis, which uses a deductive approach that focuses on both manifest and latent content. Findings: The duty of candour got onto the NHS agenda as a result of the Mid Staffordshire inquiry report and the long-term "interest group" campaign associated with Robbie's Law. It is argued that the "focusing event" of the Mid Staffordshire Inquiry Report opened the "policy window". It also highlights the importance of "policy entrepreneur" Sir Robert Francis whose "claim to a hearing", "political connections" and "persistence" was vital. Research limitations/implications: Analysis was confined to published documents. Originality/value: It highlights some of the factors that suggested why the duty of candour got onto the NHS agenda when it did.