Twenty years of accreditation in Russian higher education: lessons learnt. Issue 1 (18th February 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Motova, Galina; Navodnov, Vladimir
• Is Part Of: Higher education evaluation and development. Volume 14:Issue 1(2020)
• Page Start: 33
• Page End: 51
• Publication Date: 2020-02-18
• Subjects: Higher education -- Country -- Quality assurance -- Accreditation -- Professional-public accreditation -- State accreditation; Education, Higher -- Evaluation -- Periodicals; Universities and colleges -- Accreditation -- Periodicals; Universities and colleges -- Evaluation -- Periodicals; 378.005
• DOI: 10.1108/HEED-05-2019-0023
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2514-5789

Abstract

Abstract : Purpose: The purpose of this article is to analyze main principles, forms and approaches to education quality evaluation in the process of establishment, development and crucial changes in the state accreditation of educational institutions and study programmes in Russian higher education in the last 20 years. Design/methodology/approach: The major research method used in the paper is the qualitative analysis of legal and statistical documents, research papers and accreditation practices, which impacted the development and transformation of accreditation forms in Russia. Findings: The transformation process of state accreditation during the last 20 years was conditioned by the changes in the state education policy and socio-economic situation. In a short period, under the influence of internal and external factors, Russian higher education has experienced significant changes in the structure of higher education and quality assurance. This resulted in different approaches to accreditation: state and independent, mandatory and voluntary, national and international. Practical implications: The research outcomes may be applicable in the countries with developing accreditation systems and comparable scope of education. Social implications: The study identifies the tendencies in the development of higher education and quality evaluation. Originality/value: The paper systematizes the tendencies of development in quality assurance and distinguishes specific features and diversity of forms of the quality assurance in one of the largest systems of higher education.