Establishing User Error on the Patient-Reported Component of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Score. Issue 3 (26th March 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Bourget-Murray, Jonathan; Frederick, Ariana; Murphy, Lisa; French, Jacqui; Barwood, Shane; LeBlanc, Justin
• Is Part Of: Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine. Volume 8:Issue 3(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-03-26
• Subjects: ASES -- shoulder score -- patient-reported outcomes; Sports medicine -- Periodicals; Orthopedics -- Periodicals; Arthroscopy -- Periodicals; Arthroplasty -- Periodicals; Knee -- Surgery -- Periodicals; 616.7
• DOI: 10.1177/2325967120910094
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2325-9671

Abstract

Background: The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score is a patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaire developed to facilitate communication among international investigators and to allow comparison of outcomes for patients with shoulder disabilities. Although this PRO measure has been deemed easy to read and understand, patients may make mistakes when completing the questionnaire. Purpose: To evaluate the frequency of potential mistakes made by patients completing the ASES score. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A prospective cross-sectional study was performed for 600 ASES questionnaires completed by patients upon their first visit to 1 of 2 clinic locations (Australian vs Canadian site). Two categories of potential errors were predefined, and then differences in error rates were compared based on demographics (age, sex, and location). To determine whether these methods were reliable, an independent, third reviewer evaluated a subset of questionnaires separately. The interrater reliability was evaluated through use of the Cohen kappa. Results: The mean patient age was 49.9 years, and 63% of patients were male. The Cohen kappa was high for both evaluation methods used, at 0.831 and 0.918. On average, 17.9% of patients made at least 1 potential mistake, while an additional 10.4% of patients corrected their own mistakes. No differences in total error rate were found based on baseline demographics. Canadians and Australians had similar rates of error. Conclusion: To ensure the accuracy of the ASES score, this questionnaire should be double checked, as potential mistakes are too frequently made. This attentiveness will ensure that the ASES score remains a valid, reliable, and responsive tool to be used for further shoulder research.