Insolvency judges meet strategic behaviour: A comparative empirical study. Issue 2 (April 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: van Dijck, Gijs; Hollemans, Ruben; Maśnicka, Monika; Frade, Catarina; Benedetti, Lorenzo; Galanti, Lucilla; Fernando, Paula; Kruczalak – Jankowska, Joanna; Abriani, Niccolo; Jesus, Ruben; Machnikowska, Anna; Pagni, Ilaria
• Is Part Of: Maastricht journal of European and comparative law. Volume 27:Issue 2(2020)
• Page Start: 158
• Page End: 177
• Publication Date: 2020-04
• Subjects: Insolvency -- bankruptcy -- comparative -- empirical -- judges -- courts; Law -- European Union countries -- Periodicals; Comparative law -- Periodicals; 341.2422
• DOI: 10.1177/1023263X20906669
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1023-263X

Abstract

This article reports the results of a comparative empirical legal study that analyzed (1) strategic behaviour by actors in insolvencies that is salient to insolvency judges and (2) how insolvency judges respond to such behaviour. After examining four different European countries, namely Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, and Portugal, the study reveals how differences regarding case allocation, judge – insolvency practitioner (IP) interaction, and remuneration and case financing can result in strategic behaviour on both the side of the judges and the IPs. From this, it follows that improving the efficiency and effectiveness is not merely a matter of implementing legislation and case law, but that it also requires a look into the dynamics between insolvency judges, IPs, and other actors in the insolvency process.