Assessing the optimum combustion under constrained conditions. (June 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Olmeda, Pablo; Martín, Jaime; Novella, Ricardo; Blanco-Cavero, Diego
• Is Part Of: International journal of engine research. Volume 21:Number 5(2020)
• Page Start: 811
• Page End: 823
• Publication Date: 2020-06
• Subjects: Diesel engine -- combustion optimization -- NOx emissions -- temperature swing coating -- efficiency; Engines -- Periodicals; 629.25
• DOI: 10.1177/1468087418814086
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1468-0874

Abstract

This work studies the optimum heat release law of a direct injection diesel engine under constrained conditions. For this purpose, a zero-dimensional predictive model of a diesel engine is coupled to an optimization tool used to shape the heat release law in order to optimize some outputs (maximize gross indicated efficiency and minimize NO x emissions) while keeping several restrictions (mechanical limits such as maximum peak pressure and maximum pressure rise rate). In a first step, this methodology is applied under different heat transfer scenarios without restrictions to evaluate the possible gain obtained through the thermal isolation of the combustion chamber. Results derived from this study show that heat transfer has a negative effect on gross indicated efficiency ranging from −4% of the fuel energy ( ṁf Hv ), at high engine speed and load, up to −8% ṁf Hv, at low engine speed and load. In a second step, different mechanical limits are applied resulting in a gross indicated efficiency worsening from −1.4% ṁf Hv up to −2.8% ṁf Hv compared to the previous step when nominal constraints are applied. In these conditions, a temperature swing coating that covers the piston top and cylinder head is considered obtaining a maximum gross indicated efficiency improvement of +0.5% ṁf Hv at low load and engine speed. Finally, NO x emissions are also included in the optimization obtaining the expected tradeoff between gross indicated efficiency and NO x . Under this optimization, cutting down the experimental emissions by 50% supposes a gross indicated efficiency penalty up to −8% ṁf Hv when compared to the optimum combustion under nominal limits, while maintaining the experimental gross indicated efficiency allows to reduce the experimental emissions 30% at high load and 65% at low load and engine speed.