Battle Diffusion Matters: Examining the Impact of Microdynamics of Fighting on Conflict Termination. (May 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ito, Gaku; Hinkkainen Elliott, Kaisa
• Is Part Of: Journal of conflict resolution. Volume 64:Number 5(2020)
• Page Start: 871
• Page End: 902
• Publication Date: 2020-05
• Subjects: civil wars -- conflict resolution -- event data -- internal armed conflict -- negotiation -- spatial analysis; War and society -- Periodicals; Peace -- Periodicals; Arbitration (International law) -- Periodicals; 327.16
• DOI: 10.1177/0022002719885428
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0022-0027

Abstract

How does diffusion of civil war battles influence conflict termination? Recent advances in civil war literature have found that battle dynamics shape conflict termination by affecting the intra-conflict bargaining between disputants. This article extends the theoretical perspective and argues that how battles diffuse matters in determining conflict termination. While battlefield dynamics should in principle reveal previously unavailable private information, the relevance of information-revealing effect depends on the diffusion patterns of battles. The persistent, and possibly battle-exacerbated, commitment problem can also alter the prospects of conflict termination. We test the argument by distinguishing two distinct diffusion patterns of battles: distant and proximate. The empirical results reveal that distant diffusion, but not proximate diffusion, of battles makes civil conflicts less likely to terminate. The analysis also demonstrates that incorporating diffusion dynamics significantly improves our ability to predict conflict termination.