Supporting Surgical Teams: Identifying Needs and Barriers for Exoskeleton Implementation in the Operating Room. (May 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Cha, Jackie S.; Monfared, Sara; Stefanidis, Dimitrios; Nussbaum, Maury A.; Yu, Denny
• Other Names: Davis Kermit G. guest-editor.; Reid Christopher R. guest-editor.; Rempel David D. guest-editor.; Treaster Delia guest-editor.
• Is Part Of: Human factors. Volume 62:Number 3(2020)
• Page Start: 377
• Page End: 390
• Publication Date: 2020-05
• Subjects: industrial/workplace ergonomics -- interventions -- qualitative methods -- usability testing and evaluation -- surgical care and procedural technologies; Human engineering -- Periodicals; 620.82
• DOI: 10.1177/0018720819879271
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0018-7208

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to identify potential needs and barriers related to using exoskeletons to decrease musculoskeletal (MS) symptoms for workers in the operating room (OR). Background: MS symptoms and injuries adversely impact worker health and performance in surgical environments. Half of the surgical team members (e.g., surgeons, nurses, trainees) report MS symptoms during and after surgery. Although the ergonomic risks in surgery are well recognized, little has been done to develop and sustain effective interventions. Method: Surgical team members ( n = 14) participated in focus groups, performed a 10-min simulated surgical task with a commercial upper-body exoskeleton, and then completed a usability questionnaire. Content analysis was conducted to determine relevant themes. Results: Four themes were identified: (1) characteristics of individuals, (2) perceived benefits, (3) environmental/societal factors, and (4) intervention characteristics. Participants noted that exoskeletons would benefit workers who stand in prolonged, static postures (e.g., holding instruments for visualization) and indicated that they could foresee a long-term decrease in MS symptoms with the intervention. Specifically, raising awareness of exoskeletons for early-career workers and obtaining buy-in from team members may increase future adoption of this technology. Mean participant responses from the System Usability Scale was 81.3 out of 100 ( SD = 8.1), which was in the acceptable range of usability. Conclusion: Adoption factors were identified to implement exoskeletons in the OR, such as the indicated need for exoskeletons and usability. Exoskeletons may be beneficial in the OR, but barriers such as maintenance and safety to adoption will need to be addressed. Application: Findings from this work identify facilitators and barriers for sustained implementation of exoskeletons by surgical teams.