Effect of Sex and Ankle Brace Design on Knee Biomechanics During a Single-Leg Cut. Issue 6 (May 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ihmels, Wyatt D.; Seymore, Kayla D.; Brown, Tyler N.
• Is Part Of: American journal of sports medicine. Volume 48:Issue 6(2020)
• Page Start: 1496
• Page End: 1504
• Publication Date: 2020-05
• Subjects: ankle biomechanics -- knee injury -- total knee reaction moment -- Ankle Roll Guard; Sports medicine -- Periodicals; Sports injuries -- Periodicals; Orthopedic surgery -- Periodicals; 617.102705
• DOI: 10.1177/0363546520911048
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0363-5465

Abstract

Background: Despite success at preventing ankle sprain, prophylactics that restrict ankle plantarflexion motion may produce deleterious knee biomechanics and increase injury risk. Purpose: To determine if ankle prophylactics that restrict plantar- and dorsiflexion motion produce changes in knee biomechanics during a single-leg cut and whether those changes differ between sexes. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: A total of 17 male and 17 female participants performed a single-leg cut with 4 conditions: Ankle Roll Guard (ARG), lace-up brace, nonelastic tape, and an unbraced control. Peak stance knee flexion, abduction, and internal rotation joint angle and moment; total knee reaction moment (TKM) and its components (sagittal, frontal, and transverse); and ankle plantarflexion and inversion range of motion (ROM) and peak stance joint moments were tested with a repeated measures analysis of variance to determine the main effect and interaction of condition and sex. Results: Brace and tape restricted plantarflexion ROM as compared with ARG and control (all P < .001). With the brace, women had increased peak knee abduction angle versus ARG ( P = .012) and control ( P = .009), and men had decreased peak knee internal rotation moment as compared with ARG ( P = .032), control ( P = .006), and tape ( P = .003). Although the restrictive tape decreased inversion ROM when compared with ARG ( P = .004) and brace ( P = .017), it did not change knee biomechanics. Neither brace nor tape produced significant changes in TKM or components, yet sagittal TKM increased with ARG versus control ( P = .016). Women exhibited less ankle inversion ROM ( P = .003) and moment ( P = .049) than men, while men exhibited significantly greater frontal TKM ( P = .022) and knee internal rotation moment with the ARG ( P = .029), control ( P = .007), and tape ( P = .016). Conclusion: Prophylactics that restrict ankle plantarflexion motion may elicit knee biomechanical changes during a single-leg cut, but these changes may depend on prophylactic design and user's sex and may increase women's injury risk. Clinical Relevance: Sex-specific ankle prophylactic designs may be warranted to reduce knee injury during sports.