Assessment of Functional Recovery and Subjective Donor-Site Morbidity Following Radial Forearm Flap Reconstruction in Small- to Moderate-Sized Palatal Defects. Issue 1 (March 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Chandrappa, Ashok B.; Batth, Ritu S.; Vasudevan, Srikanth; Yellambalase, Anantheswar N. R.; Kumar, Pradeep N.; Reddy, Sudarshan; Seles, J. Nidya
• Is Part Of: Craniomaxillofacial trauma & reconstruction. Volume 13:Issue 1(2020)
• Page Start: 71
• Page End: 77
• Publication Date: 2020-03
• Subjects: palate -- radial artery free flap -- donor-site morbidity -- functional outcomes; Face -- Wounds and injuries -- Periodicals; Face -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Maxilla -- Wounds and injuries -- Periodicals; Maxilla -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Face -- Surgery; Face -- Wounds and injuries; Maxilla -- Surgery; Maxilla -- Wounds and injuries; Maxillofacial Injuries -- Periodicals; Craniocerebral Trauma -- Periodicals; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures -- methods -- Periodicals; Fulltext; Internet Resources; Periodicals; Periodicals; 617.522
• DOI: 10.1177/1943387520904879
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1943-3875

Abstract

Context: Palatal defects are encountered following tumor extirpation, trauma, or congenitally. Among the known alternatives, radial artery free forearm flap (RAFF) is a versatile flap that confers good results in head and neck reconstruction, but donor-site morbidity has been an issue of discontent among the plastic surgeons. This limitation needs to be studied further and addressed considering the unmatched quality of this tissue. Aims: This study aims to weigh the impact of the functional edge of this flap against the unpopular donor-site morbidity on a group of patients. Settings and Design: This is a retrospective analysis of recuperation of palatal function and patient concerns with the donor-site function and cosmesis on 7 consecutive patients with small-to-moderate palatal defects reconstructed with RAFF. Methods and Materials: Postoperative recovery of speech, palatal movement, and restoration of oromaxillary interface was assessed using objective tests, such as speech intelligibility testing and articulation studies. Simultaneously, subjective donor-site function and cosmesis were assessed using Patient Scar Assessment Scale (PSAS), Upper Extremity Functional Index (UEFI), and donor limb sensory testing. Results and Conclusion: Mean PSAS score was 8.28/60, and UEFI score reported was 77/80, which reflect high patient satisfaction with the donor site. Nasoendoscopy shows remarkable restoration of palate anatomy. Intelligibility testing depicts near-normal speech understandability, whereas articulation studies revealed distortions post-palatal reconstruction with RAFF. Radial artery free forearm flap should be considered as the forerunner of reconstruction in palatal defects involving less than 50%.