Qualitative Assessment of the Effect of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure on the Nasal Cavity. Issue 4 (July 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Reilly, Erin K.; Huntley, Colin T.; Boon, Maurits S.; Epps, Gregory; Vimawala, Swar; Chitguppi, Chandala; Patel, Jena; Murphy, Kira; Nyquist, Gurston G.; Rosen, Marc R.; Evans, James J.; Rabinowitz, Mindy R.
• Is Part Of: American journal of rhinology & allergy. Volume 34:Issue 4(2020)
• Page Start: 487
• Page End: 493
• Publication Date: 2020-07
• Subjects: skull base -- sinus surgery -- continuous positive airway pressure -- obstructive sleep apnea -- nasal cavity; Nose -- Periodicals; Allergy -- Periodicals; 616.21005
• DOI: 10.1177/1945892420908749
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1945-8924

Abstract

Background: For patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), there is a lack of knowledge regarding the impact of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) on the nasal cavity. There is a significant need for evidence-based recommendations regarding the appropriate use of CPAP following endoscopic sinus and skull base surgery. Objective: The goal of this study is to translate a previously developed cadaveric model for evaluating CPAP pressures in the sinonasal cavity by showing safety in vivo and quantifying the effect of positive pressurized air flow on the nasal cavity of healthy individuals where physiologic effects are at play. Methods: A previously validated cadaveric model using intracranial sensor catheters has proved to be a reliable technique for measuring sinonasal pressures. These sensors were placed in the nasal cavity of 18 healthy individuals. Pressure within the nose was recorded at increasing levels of CPAP. Results: Overall, nasal cavity pressure was on average 85% of delivered CPAP. The amount of pressure delivered to the nasal cavity increased as the CPAP increased. The percentage of CPAP delivered was 77% for 5 cmH2 O and increased to 89% at 20 cmH2 O. There was a significant difference in mean intranasal pressures between all the levels of CPAP except 5 cmH2 O and 8 cmH2 O ( P < .001). Conclusion: On average, only 85% of the pressure delivered by CPAP is transmitted to the nasal cavity. Higher CPAP pressures delivered a greater percentage of pressurized air to the nasal cavity floor. Our results are comparable to the cadaver model, which demonstrated similar pressure delivery even in the absence of anatomic factors such as lung compliance, nasal secretions, and edema. This study demonstrates the safety of using sensors in the human nasal cavity. This technology can also be utilized to evaluate the resiliency of various repair techniques for endoscopic skull base surgery with CPAP administration.