Characterization of Work Settings in Which Biosafety Professionals Conduct Operations: Results from the First Survey of the Biosafety Analytics Initiative Survey Series. (June 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Emery, Robert J.; Rios, Janelle; Becker, Zackary B.; Haltiwanger, Brett; Patlovich, Scott J.
• Is Part Of: Applied biosafety. Volume 25:Number 2(2020)
• Page Start: 90
• Page End: 95
• Publication Date: 2020-06
• Subjects: benchmarking -- biosafety analytics initiative -- biosafety program management -- training -- work setting; Industrial hygiene -- Periodicals; Public health -- Periodicals; Laboratories -- Safety measures -- Periodicals; Biosecurity -- Periodicals; Biological laboratories -- Safety measures -- Periodicals; Biological laboratories -- Security measures -- Periodicals; 613.62
• DOI: 10.1177/1535676020902614
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1535-6760

Abstract

Introduction: With the endorsement and support of the ABSA International Council and the Prevention, Preparedness and Response (P2R) Academy of The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth) School of Public Health, a survey to characterize the work settings in which biosafety professionals operate was conducted. The survey was the first of a planned series of 10 solicitations in support of an overarching "Biosafety Analytics Initiative, " the goal of which is to identify commonalities, trends, possible benchmarking opportunities, and professional training needs. Methods: The survey was developed, tested, and then distributed electronically for a 3-week period between May 29 and June 19, 2019. Results: A total of 228 ABSA International members completed responses (15.6% of total membership). The results of the survey indicate that 59.7% of the total membership respondents conduct operations in the public or private academic setting, but when separated by domestic vs international respondents, 38% of the international respondents operate in government (nonacademic) settings. The bulk of biosafety activities were reported as providing support to BSL-1 and BSL-2 laboratories, with more than 90% of respondents indicating that they support work with risk group 1 and 2 organisms. Approximately 60% of the biosafety programs responding reported being organizationally aligned within institutional Environmental Health & Safety programs. Conclusion: The results of this survey serve as a foundation for current and future ABSA International priorities regarding professional development, recruitment, and training opportunities.