Comparing aerosol refractive indices retrieved from full distribution and size- and mass-selected measurements. (November 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Radney, James G.; Zangmeister, Christopher D.
• Is Part Of: Journal of quantitative spectroscopy & radiative transfer. Volume 220(2018)
• Page Start: 52
• Page End: 66
• Publication Date: 2018-11
• Subjects: Aerosol -- Refractive index retrieval -- Radiative forcing; Spectrum analysis -- Periodicals; Radiation -- Periodicals; Analyse spectrale -- Périodiques; Rayonnement -- Périodiques; Radiation; Spectrum analysis; Periodicals; 543.0858
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2018.08.021
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0022-4073

Abstract

Highlights: Optical properties of pure & mixtures of (NH4 )2 SO4 and nigrosin aerosols measured. Compared full distribution and mass-mobility selected refractive index retrievals. Differences in complex refractive index range from 〈 0.02 to 〉 0.05. Forward calculated optical properties deviate by ≈ 20%. Normalized global average aerosol radiative forcing exhibit different signs. Abstract: Refractive index retrievals (also termed inverse Mie methods or optical closure) have seen considerable use as a method to extract the refractive index of aerosol particles from measured optical properties. Retrievals of an aerosol refractive index use one of two primary methods: 1) measurements of the extinction, absorption and/or scattering cross-sections or efficiencies of size- (and mass-) selected particles for mass-mobility refractive index retrievals (MM-RIR) or 2) measurements of aerosol size distributions and a combination of the extinction, absorption and/or scattering coefficients for full distribution refractive index retrievals (FD-RIR). These two methods were compared in this study using pure and mixtures of ammonium sulfate (AS) and nigrosin aerosol, which constitute a non-absorbing and absorbing material, respectively. The results indicate that the retrieved complex refractive index values are correlated to the amount of nigrosin in the aerosol but can be highly variable with differences in the real and imaginary components that range between –0.002 and 0.216 and –0.013 and 0.086; the average and standard deviation of the differences are 0.046 ± 0.046 and 0.023 ± 0.033, respectively. Forward calculation of the optical properties yielded average absolute values of the relative deviation of ≈ 15% and ≈ 26% for FD-RIR data using the MM-RIR values and contrariwise. The range of retrieved refractive indices were used to calculate the normalized global average aerosol radiative forcing of a model accumulation mode remote continental aerosol. Deviations using the refractive indices of the pure materials range from 9% to 32% for AS and 27% to 45% for nigrosin. For mixtures of nigrosin and AS, deviations were all > 100% and not always able to capture the correct direction of the forcing; i.e., positive versus negative.