Distinct roles of L‐ and T‐type voltage‐dependent Ca2+ channels in regulation of lymphatic vessel contractile activity. (30th October 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Lee, Stewart; Roizes, Simon; von der Weid, Pierre‐Yves
• Is Part Of: Journal of physiology. Volume 592:Number 24(2014:Dec.)
• Page Start: 5409
• Page End: 5427
• Publication Date: 2014-10-30
• Subjects: Physiology -- Periodicals; 612.005
• DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2014.280347
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0022-3751

Abstract

Abstract : Key points: Lymph transport is promoted by lymphatic pumping, a robust phasic contractile activity of the collecting lymphatic vessels. This contractile function, critical for tissue fluid homeostasis and immune cell transport to lymph nodes, is regulated by the amount of lymph entering the vessels and subsequent distension of the vessel wall. While lymphatic pumping relies on influx of Ca 2+ through voltage‐dependent Ca 2+ channels, characterization of these channels and details of their contribution to the regulation of stretch‐activated contractions are lacking. Here we report the expression of L‐ and T‐type Ca 2+ channels in rat mesenteric lymphatic vessels and their differential role in regulating strength and frequency of lymphatic contractions. This study fosters our knowledge on the mechanisms that drive stretch‐activated lymphatic contractions. It may help in providing a basis to developing agents able to enhance lymphatic function, which could be of therapeutic benefit during lymphatic impairment such as lymphoedema. Abstract: Lymph drainage maintains tissue fluid homeostasis and facilitates immune response. It is promoted by phasic contractions of collecting lymphatic vessels through which lymph is propelled back into the blood circulation. This rhythmic contractile activity (i.e. lymphatic pumping) increases in rate with increase in luminal pressure and relies on activation of nifedipine‐sensitive voltage‐dependent Ca 2+ channels (VDCCs). Despite their importance, these channels have not been characterized in lymphatic vessels. We used pressure‐ and wire‐myography as well as intracellular microelectrode electrophysiology to characterize the pharmacological and electrophysiological properties of L‐type and T‐type VDCCs in rat mesenteric lymphatic vessels and evaluated their particular role in the regulation of lymphatic pumping by stretch. We complemented our study with PCR and confocal immunofluorescence imaging to investigate the expression and localization of these channels in lymphatic vessels. Our data suggest a delineating role of VDCCs in stretch‐induced lymphatic vessel contractions, as the stretch‐induced increase in force of lymphatic vessel contractions was significantly attenuated in the presence of L‐type VDCC blockers nifedipine and diltiazem, while the stretch‐induced increase in contraction frequency was significantly decreased by the T‐type VDCC blockers mibefradil and nickel. The latter effect was correlated with a hyperpolarization. We propose that activation of T‐type VDCCs depolarizes membrane potential, regulating the frequency of lymphatic contractions via opening of L‐type VDCCs, which drive the strength of contractions.