Comparison of risk scores and shock index in hemodynamically stable patients presenting to the emergency department with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Issue 7 (July 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Comparison of risk scores and shock index in hemodynamically stable patients presenting to the emergency department with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Issue 7 (July 2019)
- Main Title:
- Comparison of risk scores and shock index in hemodynamically stable patients presenting to the emergency department with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding
- Authors:
- Jung, Dae Ho
Ko, Byuk Sung
Kim, Youn-Jung
Kim, Won Young - Abstract:
- Abstract : Objective: Risk assessment in nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is not well validated and remains unclear in hemodynamically stable patients at emergency department admission. We compared the prognostic value of risk-scoring systems for predicting adverse outcomes in patients with nonvariceal UGIB and normotension. Participants and methods: A single-center prospective observational study was carried out. Patients with consecutive nonvariceal UGIB, presenting with normotension (systolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg) to the emergency department, were included. We compared the areas under the curves (AUC) of Glasgow Blatchford score (GBS), the pre-endoscopy Rockall score, AIMS65, the shock index, and the modified shock index with respect to adverse outcomes defined as embolization, surgery, ICU admission, rebleeding, and in-hospital mortality. Results: In total, 1233 patients were included. Adverse outcomes occurred in 165 (13.4%) patients; in-hospital mortality was 1.2%. AUC of the GBS for adverse outcome was higher than that of the shock index, but not significantly different (0.647 vs. 0.569, P =0.23). AUC values of the modified shock index, AIMS65, and the pre-endoscopy Rockall score were 0.565, 0.593, and 0.533, respectively. The cut-off value of the GBS (≥8) was associated with 85% sensitivity and 35% specificity for predicting adverse outcome. Conclusion: Pre-existing risk scores have shown suboptimal predictive ability for adverse events inAbstract : Objective: Risk assessment in nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is not well validated and remains unclear in hemodynamically stable patients at emergency department admission. We compared the prognostic value of risk-scoring systems for predicting adverse outcomes in patients with nonvariceal UGIB and normotension. Participants and methods: A single-center prospective observational study was carried out. Patients with consecutive nonvariceal UGIB, presenting with normotension (systolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg) to the emergency department, were included. We compared the areas under the curves (AUC) of Glasgow Blatchford score (GBS), the pre-endoscopy Rockall score, AIMS65, the shock index, and the modified shock index with respect to adverse outcomes defined as embolization, surgery, ICU admission, rebleeding, and in-hospital mortality. Results: In total, 1233 patients were included. Adverse outcomes occurred in 165 (13.4%) patients; in-hospital mortality was 1.2%. AUC of the GBS for adverse outcome was higher than that of the shock index, but not significantly different (0.647 vs. 0.569, P =0.23). AUC values of the modified shock index, AIMS65, and the pre-endoscopy Rockall score were 0.565, 0.593, and 0.533, respectively. The cut-off value of the GBS (≥8) was associated with 85% sensitivity and 35% specificity for predicting adverse outcome. Conclusion: Pre-existing risk scores have shown suboptimal predictive ability for adverse events in normotensive patients with nonvariceal UGIB. The GBS (≥8) might help to identify patients prone to adverse events; however, further studies with risk scores or new scores are needed because of the low accuracy of these scores. Abstract : Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology. Volume 31:Issue 7(2019)
- Journal:
- European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology
- Issue:
- Volume 31:Issue 7(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 31, Issue 7 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 31
- Issue:
- 7
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0031-0007-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2019-07
- Subjects:
- outcome -- risk assessment -- upper gastrointestinal bleeding
Digestive organs -- Diseases -- Periodicals
Liver -- Diseases -- Periodicals
Digestive organs -- Diseases
Liver -- Diseases
Periodicals
616.33 - Journal URLs:
- http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&NEWS=n&CSC=Y&PAGE=toc&D=yrovft&AN=00042737-000000000-00000 ↗
http://www.eurojgh.com/ ↗
http://journals.lww.com/pages/default.aspx ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001422 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0954-691X
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3829.729400
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 13062.xml