The Impact of Canalplasty on Outcomes of Medial Graft Tympanoplasty. Issue 6 (July 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Morrison, Daniel R.; O'Connell, Brendan; Lambert, Paul R.
• Is Part Of: Otology & neurotology. Volume 40:Issue 6(2019)
• Publication Date: 2019-07
• Subjects: Canalplasty -- Cartilage -- Graft -- Lateral -- Medial -- Perforation -- Tympanoplasty; Otology -- Periodicals; Ear -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Skull base -- Surgery -- Periodicals; 617.8005
• DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002259
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1531-7129

Abstract

Abstract : Objective: Both medial and lateral graft techniques are commonly employed in tympanoplasty with acceptable closure rates. Canalplasty is routinely performed to obtain adequate exposure in the lateral graft technique; this usually entails removal of the anterior canal wall skin with subsequent replacement as a free graft. While formal canalplasty can also be performed in conjunction with medial graft technique to improve exposure, it is not commonly described. The current study seeks to examine the impact of canalplasty on outcomes of medial graft tympanoplasty. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed for patients undergoing tympanoplasty for chronic otitis media with the senior author. Audiometric data were recorded both preoperatively and postoperatively. Primary outcome measure was perforation closure with audiometric outcomes examined as secondary outcome measures. Results: One hundred seventy tympanoplasties without ossiculoplasty were included in our study. The overall rate of perforation closure postoperatively was 77%. Cartilage use portended a higher closure rate (100%) when compared with nonuse (75%) ( p = 0.04). The success rates with lateral grafts (94%) and medial grafts with canalplasty (92%) were considerably higher than obtained with medial grafts without canalplasty (69%) ( p = 0.005 and 0.02, respectively). In cases with anterior perforations greater than 25% of the tympanic membrane, our results demonstrated a significant advantage in performing canalplasty ( p = 0.04). Conclusions: Data from the current study suggest that canalplasty offers benefit regarding closure rate in medial graft tympanoplasty. Use of cartilage also portended a higher rate of perforation closure. Canalplasty should be considered when using medial graft techniques if exposure is limited due to bony canal anatomy.