The effect of hemorrhage control adjuncts on outcome in severe pelvic fracture: A multi-institutional study. Issue 1 (July 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- The effect of hemorrhage control adjuncts on outcome in severe pelvic fracture: A multi-institutional study. Issue 1 (July 2019)
- Main Title:
- The effect of hemorrhage control adjuncts on outcome in severe pelvic fracture
- Authors:
- Duchesne, Juan
Costantini, Todd W.
Khan, Mansoor
Taub, Ethan
Rhee, Peter
Morse, Bryan
Namias, Nicholas
Schwarz, Alon
Graves, Joanne
Kim, Dennis Y.
Howell, Erin
Sperry, Jason
Anto, Vincent
Winfield, Robert D.
Schreiber, Martin
Behrens, Brandon
Martinez, Benjamin
Raza, Shariq
Seamon, Mark
Tatum, Danielle - Abstract:
- Abstract : BACKGROUND: Hemodynamically unstable patients with severe pelvic fracture are a significant challenge to trauma surgeons and have high mortality. Significant variability across institutions in hemorrhage control adjuncts used to quell pelvic bleeding has been demonstrated. However, the effect of these methods on time to definitive bleeding control, type of resuscitation given, and outcomes remains unknown. We sought to elucidate those effects. METHODS: This was a multicenter retrospective review of severe pelvic fracture patients in shock between 2011 and 2016. Shock was defined as systolic blood pressure less than 90 mm Hg, heart rate greater than 120 beats per minute, or base deficit less than −5. Definitive bleeding control was defined as time to surgical control in the operating room or embolization by interventional radiology. Significance level was at p less than 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 279 severe pelvic fracture patients with shock on admission from 12 trauma centers were included. The cohort was primarily male (62%) with median (interquartile range) age of 40 years (28–54 years), Injury Severity Score of 38 (29–50), and Glasgow Coma Scale score of 13 (3–15). Overall mortality was 32%. The most common adjunct used was pelvic binder (50%) followed by no adjunct (30.5%); least common was resuscitative balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) (2.5%). Preperitoneal packing alone and REBOA alone/with other adjunct(s) resulted in the fastest times to operatingAbstract : BACKGROUND: Hemodynamically unstable patients with severe pelvic fracture are a significant challenge to trauma surgeons and have high mortality. Significant variability across institutions in hemorrhage control adjuncts used to quell pelvic bleeding has been demonstrated. However, the effect of these methods on time to definitive bleeding control, type of resuscitation given, and outcomes remains unknown. We sought to elucidate those effects. METHODS: This was a multicenter retrospective review of severe pelvic fracture patients in shock between 2011 and 2016. Shock was defined as systolic blood pressure less than 90 mm Hg, heart rate greater than 120 beats per minute, or base deficit less than −5. Definitive bleeding control was defined as time to surgical control in the operating room or embolization by interventional radiology. Significance level was at p less than 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 279 severe pelvic fracture patients with shock on admission from 12 trauma centers were included. The cohort was primarily male (62%) with median (interquartile range) age of 40 years (28–54 years), Injury Severity Score of 38 (29–50), and Glasgow Coma Scale score of 13 (3–15). Overall mortality was 32%. The most common adjunct used was pelvic binder (50%) followed by no adjunct (30.5%); least common was resuscitative balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) (2.5%). Preperitoneal packing alone and REBOA alone/with other adjunct(s) resulted in the fastest times to operating room/interventional radiology but also had the highest blood utilization and mortality rates. Resuscitative balloon occlusion of the aorta was most often used along with pelvic binder (6 of 13; 46%). CONCLUSION: Marked variation in management of severe pelvic fracture patients in shock indicates the need for a standardized approach to maximize outcomes and minimize transfusion requirements. The use of preperitoneal packing and/or REBOA yielded fastest times to definitive bleeding control. However, REBOA continues to be infrequently used. Future prospective analysis of this combination needs further validation in patients with severe pelvic hemorrhage. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, level IV. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of trauma and acute care surgery. Volume 87:Issue 1(2019)
- Journal:
- Journal of trauma and acute care surgery
- Issue:
- Volume 87:Issue 1(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 87, Issue 1 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 87
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0087-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2019-07
- Subjects:
- Pelvic fracture -- hemorrhage control -- pelvic binder -- preperitoneal packing -- REBOA
Surgical intensive care -- Periodicals
Surgical emergencies -- Periodicals
Wounds and injuries -- Surgery -- Periodicals
617.026 - Journal URLs:
- http://journals.lww.com/jtrauma/pages/default.aspx ↗
http://ovidsp.tx.ovid.com/sp-3.5.0b/ovidweb.cgi?&S=NEIKFPIGHGDDBOHLNCALMDIBGLDKAA00&Browse=Toc+Children%7cNO%7cS.sh.2697_1327404888_15.2697_1327404888_27.2697_1327404888_28%7c273%7c50 ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/TA.0000000000002316 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2163-0755
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5070.510500
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 13036.xml