Participatory video proposals: A tool for empowering farmer groups in rural innovation processes?. (July 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Richardson-Ngwenya, Pamela; Restrepo, María J.; Fernández, Raúl; Kaufmann, Brigitte A.
• Is Part Of: Journal of rural studies. Volume 69(2019)
• Page Start: 173
• Page End: 185
• Publication Date: 2019-07
• Subjects: Participatory video proposals -- Participatory video -- Video proposals -- Local innovation grants -- Empowerment -- Participatory action research -- Information and communication technologies for development (ICT4D) -- Agricultural research for development (ARD); Sociology, Rural -- Periodicals; Country life -- Periodicals; Rural development -- Periodicals; Land use, Rural -- Planning -- Periodicals; Rural conditions -- Periodicals; Sociologie rurale -- Périodiques; Vie rurale -- Périodiques; Développement rural -- Périodiques; Sol, Utilisation agricole du -- Planification -- Périodiques; Conditions rurales -- Périodiques; Country life; Land use, Rural -- Planning; Rural conditions; Rural development; Sociology, Rural; Periodicals; 307.72
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.02.022
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0743-0167

Abstract

Abstract: While efforts are increasingly made to democratize research relationships, empower participants and include marginalised voices in agricultural research for development, it is acknowledged that power imbalances in knowledge creation remain integral to researcher-participant relations. Moreover, published results seldom report on the different dimensions that empowerment can encompass. This paper addresses this gap, presenting an original methodological approach for collaborating with smallholder farmers and developing an analytical framework to critically assess associated modalities of empowerment. With the intention of developing more democratic processes of knowledge production to support innovation processes, five smallholder farmer groups were invited to apply for action funds to co-develop innovations to enhance livelihoods. Employing participatory video (PV), groups applied for the grants using a 'video proposal'. Group members collaboratively produced videos representing their problems, aims and innovation plans. Key findings around group empowerment are presented and reflected upon with regard to the different modalities of "power-to", "power-with", "power-within" and "power-over". The PV proposal process proved to be a good tool for supporting farmer group capacity building and the development of competencies in relation to farmers' rural innovation projects. The process enhanced farmer groups' "power-to" in terms of planning capacities. This fostered motivation for action and a sense of collective ownership; thus building "power-with" at the group level. The understanding of power mobilised in this paper enabled us to highlight some context-specific limitations to democratising research relationships and creating more inclusive spaces for participatory action research and rural innovation development. These are related to entrenched socio-cultural power dynamics within the groups and to possibilities to sustain the empowerment process beyond the duration of the project. Nevertheless, funding agencies and local rural development organisations could consider the method discussed in this paper as a valuable tool for assisting marginalised groups in accessing innovation funds. Highlights: Aspects of group empowerment are described with regard to modalities of power-to, power-with, power-within and power-over. We put focus on farmers' perspectives of the process of video production and offer critical reflections from the researchers. Examples show that this innovative method can be helpful for supporting group capacity building. In particular, PV proposals enabled the groups to communicate and represent themselves and their ideas to outside funders. PV proposals are a highly promising tool for empowering farmer groups, but there are important limitations and constraints.