A review of uncertainty representations and metaverification of uncertainty assessment techniques for renewable energies. (November 2018)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- A review of uncertainty representations and metaverification of uncertainty assessment techniques for renewable energies. (November 2018)
- Main Title:
- A review of uncertainty representations and metaverification of uncertainty assessment techniques for renewable energies
- Authors:
- Gensler, André
Sick, Bernhard
Vogt, Stephan - Abstract:
- Abstract: The performance evaluation of forecasting algorithms is an essential requirement for quality assessment and model comparison. In recent years, algorithms that issue predictive distributions rather than point forecasts have evolved, as they better represent the stochastic nature of the underlying numerical weather prediction and power conversion processes. Standard error measures used for the evaluation of point forecasts are not sufficient for the evaluation of probabilistic forecasts. In comparison to deterministic error measures, many probabilistic scoring rules lack intuition as they have to satisfy a number of requirements such as reliability and sharpness, whereas deterministic forecasts only need to be close to the actual observations. This article aims to empower practitioners and users of probabilistic forecasts to be able to choose appropriate uncertainty representations and scoring rules depending on the desired application and available data. A holistic view of the most popular forms of uncertainty representation from single forecasts and ensembles is given, followed by a presentation of the most popular scoring rules. We want to broaden the understanding for the working principles and relationship of different scoring rules and their decomposition for probabilistic forecasts of continuous variables by showing their differences. Therefore, we analyze the behavior of scoring rules, a process frequently referred to as metaverification, in detail onAbstract: The performance evaluation of forecasting algorithms is an essential requirement for quality assessment and model comparison. In recent years, algorithms that issue predictive distributions rather than point forecasts have evolved, as they better represent the stochastic nature of the underlying numerical weather prediction and power conversion processes. Standard error measures used for the evaluation of point forecasts are not sufficient for the evaluation of probabilistic forecasts. In comparison to deterministic error measures, many probabilistic scoring rules lack intuition as they have to satisfy a number of requirements such as reliability and sharpness, whereas deterministic forecasts only need to be close to the actual observations. This article aims to empower practitioners and users of probabilistic forecasts to be able to choose appropriate uncertainty representations and scoring rules depending on the desired application and available data. A holistic view of the most popular forms of uncertainty representation from single forecasts and ensembles is given, followed by a presentation of the most popular scoring rules. We want to broaden the understanding for the working principles and relationship of different scoring rules and their decomposition for probabilistic forecasts of continuous variables by showing their differences. Therefore, we analyze the behavior of scoring rules, a process frequently referred to as metaverification, in detail on real-world multi-model ensemble forecasts in a number of case studies. Abstract : Highlights: An extensive overview of different forms of construction and representation of probabilistic forecasts for renewable energies. A holistic view of forms of uncertainty representation that enable a better comparability of probabilistic forecasting algorithms. A detailed comparison of characteristics of algorithms that create distribution forecasts. A performance analysis and a detailed investigation of characteristics of the presented scoring rules. Detailed investigation of the role of scoring rule decomposition and presentation of differences in the expressiveness of decomposition components. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Renewable & sustainable energy reviews. Volume 96(2018)
- Journal:
- Renewable & sustainable energy reviews
- Issue:
- Volume 96(2018)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 96, Issue 2018 (2018)
- Year:
- 2018
- Volume:
- 96
- Issue:
- 2018
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2018-0096-2018-0000
- Page Start:
- 352
- Page End:
- 379
- Publication Date:
- 2018-11
- Subjects:
- Power forecasting -- Probabilistic forecasting -- Performance assessment -- Forecast verification -- Scoring rule decomposition -- Ensemble methods
Renewable energy sources -- Periodicals
Power resources -- Periodicals
Énergies renouvelables -- Périodiques
Ressources énergétiques -- Périodiques
333.794 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/13640321 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗
http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-and-sustainable-energy-reviews ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.rser.2018.07.042 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1364-0321
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 7364.186000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 13031.xml