Effect of Enhanced Efficiency Fertilizers on Nitrous Oxide Emissions and Crop Yields: A Meta‐analysis. Issue 5 (13th October 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Effect of Enhanced Efficiency Fertilizers on Nitrous Oxide Emissions and Crop Yields: A Meta‐analysis. Issue 5 (13th October 2016)
- Main Title:
- Effect of Enhanced Efficiency Fertilizers on Nitrous Oxide Emissions and Crop Yields: A Meta‐analysis
- Authors:
- Thapa, Resham
Chatterjee, Amitava
Awale, Rakesh
McGranahan, Devan A.
Daigh, Aaron - Abstract:
- Abstract : Core Ideas: Effectiveness of EEFs varied greatly with their modes of action, soils, and management factors. NIs, DIs, and CRFs reduced N2O emissions by 38, 30, and 19%, respectively, compared with conventional N fertilizers. NIs increased overall crop yields by 7% compared with conventional N fertilizers. DIs might provide added benefits over NIs in alkaline soils, coarse‐textured soils, and irrigated systems. Enhanced efficiency fertilizers (EEFs) have the potential to reduce N2 O emissions and improve crop productivity, but the impact of soil and management conditions on their effectiveness is not clear. We conducted a meta‐analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of different EEF types in reducing N2 O emissions in three cereal production systems: rice ( Oryza sativa L.), corn ( Zea mays L.), and wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.). We also compared EEF efficacy across soil and management conditions for corn and wheat systems. Results showed that the effect of EEFs on N2 O emissions and crop yields varied greatly with their modes of action, soil types, and management conditions. Nitrification inhibitors (NIs), double inhibitors (DIs: urease plus nitrification inhibitors), and controlled‐release N fertilizers (CRFs) consistently reduced N2 O emissions compared with conventional N fertilizers across soil and management conditions (grand mean decreases of 38, 30, and 19%, respectively). The DIs more effectively reduced N2 O emissions in alkaline soils than did NIs, butAbstract : Core Ideas: Effectiveness of EEFs varied greatly with their modes of action, soils, and management factors. NIs, DIs, and CRFs reduced N2O emissions by 38, 30, and 19%, respectively, compared with conventional N fertilizers. NIs increased overall crop yields by 7% compared with conventional N fertilizers. DIs might provide added benefits over NIs in alkaline soils, coarse‐textured soils, and irrigated systems. Enhanced efficiency fertilizers (EEFs) have the potential to reduce N2 O emissions and improve crop productivity, but the impact of soil and management conditions on their effectiveness is not clear. We conducted a meta‐analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of different EEF types in reducing N2 O emissions in three cereal production systems: rice ( Oryza sativa L.), corn ( Zea mays L.), and wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.). We also compared EEF efficacy across soil and management conditions for corn and wheat systems. Results showed that the effect of EEFs on N2 O emissions and crop yields varied greatly with their modes of action, soil types, and management conditions. Nitrification inhibitors (NIs), double inhibitors (DIs: urease plus nitrification inhibitors), and controlled‐release N fertilizers (CRFs) consistently reduced N2 O emissions compared with conventional N fertilizers across soil and management conditions (grand mean decreases of 38, 30, and 19%, respectively). The DIs more effectively reduced N2 O emissions in alkaline soils than did NIs, but the trend was reversed in acidic soils. Urease inhibitors also reduced N2 O emissions compared with conventional N fertilizers in coarse‐textured soils and irrigated systems. Overall crop yields increased by 7% with the addition of NIs alone. Compared with conventional N fertilizers, DIs also increased crop yields in alkaline soils, coarse‐textured soils, and irrigated systems. However, CRFs had no effect on crop yields. Overall, this study suggests that NIs or DIs can reduce N2 O emissions while improving crop yields. Growers should select EEFs based on their soil and management conditions to maximize their effectiveness. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Soil Science Society of America Journal. Volume 80:Issue 5(2016)
- Journal:
- Soil Science Society of America Journal
- Issue:
- Volume 80:Issue 5(2016)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 80, Issue 5 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 80
- Issue:
- 5
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0080-0005-0000
- Page Start:
- 1121
- Page End:
- 1134
- Publication Date:
- 2016-10-13
- Subjects:
- Soils -- United States -- Periodicals
Soil science -- Periodicals
Periodicals
631.4973 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗
https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/14350661 ↗ - DOI:
- 10.2136/sssaj2016.06.0179 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0361-5995
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 14415.xml